The Toeplitz-Hausdorff Theorem Explained
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 14 (1971) no. 2, pp. 245-246

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge

DOI

Paul Halmos expressed [3, p. 110] the general dissatisfaction with the usual proofs of this famous and important theorem. They all make it seem like an accidental product of a computation. A more conceptual proof was devised by N. P. Dekker. In spite of the elegance of his proof, the one offered below may have some claim to be regarded as "the reason the theorem is true".
Davis, Chandler. The Toeplitz-Hausdorff Theorem Explained. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 14 (1971) no. 2, pp. 245-246. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1971-042-7
@article{10_4153_CMB_1971_042_7,
     author = {Davis, Chandler},
     title = {The {Toeplitz-Hausdorff} {Theorem} {Explained}},
     journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
     pages = {245--246},
     year = {1971},
     volume = {14},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.4153/CMB-1971-042-7},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1971-042-7/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Davis, Chandler
TI  - The Toeplitz-Hausdorff Theorem Explained
JO  - Canadian mathematical bulletin
PY  - 1971
SP  - 245
EP  - 246
VL  - 14
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1971-042-7/
DO  - 10.4153/CMB-1971-042-7
ID  - 10_4153_CMB_1971_042_7
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Davis, Chandler
%T The Toeplitz-Hausdorff Theorem Explained
%J Canadian mathematical bulletin
%D 1971
%P 245-246
%V 14
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1971-042-7/
%R 10.4153/CMB-1971-042-7
%F 10_4153_CMB_1971_042_7

Cité par Sources :