Geodesic
On the Weak Order of Coxeter Groups
Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 71 (2019) no. 2, pp. 299-336

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge

DOI

This paper provides some evidence for conjectural relations between extensions of (right) weak order on Coxeter groups, closure operators on root systems, and Bruhat order. The conjecture focused upon here refines an earlier question as to whether the set of initial sections of reflection orders, ordered by inclusion, forms a complete lattice. Meet and join in weak order are described in terms of a suitable closure operator. Galois connections are defined from the power set of $W$ to itself, under which maximal subgroups of certain groupoids correspond to certain complete meet subsemilattices of weak order. An analogue of weak order for standard parabolic subsets of any rank of the root system is defined, reducing to the usual weak order in rank zero, and having some analogous properties in rank one (and conjecturally in general).
DOI : 10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0
Mots-clés : Coxeter group, root system, weak order, lattice 
Dyer, Matthew. On the Weak Order of Coxeter Groups. Canadian journal of mathematics, Tome 71 (2019) no. 2, pp. 299-336. doi: 10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0
@article{10_4153_CJM_2017_059_0,
     author = {Dyer, Matthew},
     title = {On the {Weak} {Order} of {Coxeter} {Groups}},
     journal = {Canadian journal of mathematics},
     pages = {299--336},
     year = {2019},
     volume = {71},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dyer, Matthew
TI  - On the Weak Order of Coxeter Groups
JO  - Canadian journal of mathematics
PY  - 2019
SP  - 299
EP  - 336
VL  - 71
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0/
DO  - 10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0
ID  - 10_4153_CJM_2017_059_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Dyer, Matthew
%T On the Weak Order of Coxeter Groups
%J Canadian journal of mathematics
%D 2019
%P 299-336
%V 71
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0/
%R 10.4153/CJM-2017-059-0
%F 10_4153_CJM_2017_059_0

Cité par Sources :