Geodesic
A simplified variant of the hierarchy analysis on the ground of nonlinear convolution of criteria
Žurnal vyčislitelʹnoj matematiki i matematičeskoj fiziki, Tome 44 (2004) no. 7, pp. 1261-1270 
V. D. Nogin. A simplified variant of the hierarchy analysis on the ground of nonlinear convolution of criteria. Žurnal vyčislitelʹnoj matematiki i matematičeskoj fiziki, Tome 44 (2004) no. 7, pp. 1261-1270. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZVMMF_2004_44_7_a8/
@article{ZVMMF_2004_44_7_a8,
     author = {V. D. Nogin},
     title = {A simplified variant of the hierarchy analysis on the ground of nonlinear convolution of criteria},
     journal = {\v{Z}urnal vy\v{c}islitelʹnoj matematiki i matemati\v{c}eskoj fiziki},
     pages = {1261--1270},
     year = {2004},
     volume = {44},
     number = {7},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZVMMF_2004_44_7_a8/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. D. Nogin
TI  - A simplified variant of the hierarchy analysis on the ground of nonlinear convolution of criteria
JO  - Žurnal vyčislitelʹnoj matematiki i matematičeskoj fiziki
PY  - 2004
SP  - 1261
EP  - 1270
VL  - 44
IS  - 7
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZVMMF_2004_44_7_a8/
LA  - ru
ID  - ZVMMF_2004_44_7_a8
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. D. Nogin
%T A simplified variant of the hierarchy analysis on the ground of nonlinear convolution of criteria
%J Žurnal vyčislitelʹnoj matematiki i matematičeskoj fiziki
%D 2004
%P 1261-1270
%V 44
%N 7
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZVMMF_2004_44_7_a8/
%G ru
%F ZVMMF_2004_44_7_a8

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

[1] Saaty T. L., “An eigenvalue allocation model for prioritization and planning”, Energy Management and Policy Center, Univ. of Pennsylvania, 1972

[2] Saati T., Kerns K., Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizatsiya sistem, Radio i svyaz, M., 1991

[3] Saati T., Prinyatie reshenii. Metod analiza ierarkhii, Radio i svyaz, M., 1989

[4] Saaty T. L., Multicriteria decision making. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation, Univ. Pittsburgh; RWS Publ., 1990

[5] Yu P. L., Multiple criteria decision making: Concepts, techniques, and extensions, Plenum Press, New York–London, 1985 | MR

[6] Andreichikov A. V., Andreichikova O. H., Analiz, sintez, planirovanie reshenii v ekonomike, Finansy i statistika, M., 2001

[7] Larichev O. I., Teoriya i metody prinyatiya reshenii, Logos, M., 2000

[8] Nogin V. D., Chistyakov S. V., Primenenie lineinoi algebry v prinyatii reshenii, SPbGTU, SPb., 1998

[9] Triantaphillou E., “Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP”, J. Multi-Criteria Decision Analys., 10 (2001), 11–25 | DOI

[10] Germeier Yu. B., Vvedenie v teoriyu issledovaniya operatsii, Nauka, M., 1971 | MR

[11] Karmanov V. G., Fedorov V. V., Modelirovanie v issledovanii operatsii, Tvema, M., 1996

[12] Podinovskii V. V., Nogin V. D., Pareto-optimalnye resheniya mnogokriterialnykh zadach, Nauka, M., 1982 | MR

[13] Kharari F., Teoriya grafov, Mir, M., 1973 | MR

[14] Nogin V. D., “Logicheskoe obosnovanie printsipa Edzhvorta–Pareto”, Zh. vychisl. matem. i matem. fiz., 42:7 (2002), 951–957 | MR | Zbl

[15] Nogin V. D., Prinyatie reshenii v mnogokriterialnoi srede: kolichestvennyi podkhod, Fizmatlit, M., 2002 | Zbl