A set of~$12$ numbers is not determined by its set of $4$-sums
Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Representation theory, dynamical systems, combinatorial methods. Part XXVII, Tome 448 (2016), pp. 135-142
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
We present two sets of $12$ integers that have the same sets of $4$-sums. The proof of the uniqueness of determination of a set of $12$ numbers by its set of $4$-sums published 50 years ago is wrong, and we demonstrate an incorrect calculation in it.
@article{ZNSL_2016_448_a8,
author = {J. E. Isomurodov and K. P. Kokhas},
title = {A set of~$12$ numbers is not determined by its set of $4$-sums},
journal = {Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI},
pages = {135--142},
publisher = {mathdoc},
volume = {448},
year = {2016},
language = {ru},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2016_448_a8/}
}
J. E. Isomurodov; K. P. Kokhas. A set of~$12$ numbers is not determined by its set of $4$-sums. Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Representation theory, dynamical systems, combinatorial methods. Part XXVII, Tome 448 (2016), pp. 135-142. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2016_448_a8/