Two families of normality tests based on Polya characterization, and their efficiency
    
    
  
  
  
      
      
      
        
Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Probability and statistics. Part 9, Tome 328 (2005), pp. 147-159
    
  
  
  
  
  
    
      
      
        
      
      
      
    Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
            
              			For testing of normality we introduce two families of statistics based on extended Polya characterization
of the normal law. The first family depends on parameter $a\in(0,1)$, and for any $a$ its members are
asymptotically normal and consistent for many alternatives of interest. We study the local Bahadur
efficiency of these statistics as a function of $a$ and find that for common alternatives the Polya case $a=1/\sqrt{2}$ is the worst and the maximum of efficiency is attained for $a$ close to 0 or 1. The second family depends
on natural $m$ and the efficiency increases when $m$ grows.
			
            
            
            
          
        
      @article{ZNSL_2005_328_a7,
     author = {V. V. Litvinova and Ya. Yu. Nikitin},
     title = {Two families of normality tests based on {Polya} characterization, and their efficiency},
     journal = {Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI},
     pages = {147--159},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {328},
     year = {2005},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2005_328_a7/}
}
                      
                      
                    TY - JOUR AU - V. V. Litvinova AU - Ya. Yu. Nikitin TI - Two families of normality tests based on Polya characterization, and their efficiency JO - Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI PY - 2005 SP - 147 EP - 159 VL - 328 PB - mathdoc UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2005_328_a7/ LA - ru ID - ZNSL_2005_328_a7 ER -
V. V. Litvinova; Ya. Yu. Nikitin. Two families of normality tests based on Polya characterization, and their efficiency. Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Probability and statistics. Part 9, Tome 328 (2005), pp. 147-159. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ZNSL_2005_328_a7/