Disreteness of the spectrum for the Schr\"odinger operator and metric transformation on manifold

A. V. Svetlov

Matematičeskaâ fizika i kompʹûternoe modelirovanie, no. 5 (2016), pp. 97-103.

Résumé

In this paper we proof the conservation property for the discreteness of the spectrum for the Schrödinger operator on the simple warped products of order $k$ with the special kind of quasi-isometric transformation of the metric. Let's consider a complete noncompact Riemannian manifold $D$, which is isometric to the product ${\mathbb R}_+ \times \mathrm{S}_1\times \mathrm{S}_2\times\cdots\times \mathrm{S}_k$ (where ${\mathbb R}_+=(0,+\infty)$, and $\mathrm{S}_i$ are compact Riemannian manifolds without boundary) with metric $$ds^2=dr^2+q_1^2(r)d\theta_1^2+\cdots+q_k^2(r)d\theta_k^2,$$ where $d\theta_i^2$ is the metric on ${\mathrm S}_i$ and $q_i(r)$ is a smooth positive function on ${\mathbb R}_+$. We assume $\dim{\mathrm S}_i=n_i$ and denote $s(r)=q_1^{n_1}(r)\cdots q_k^{n_k}(r).$ Metric transformation on this manifold is determined by the following matrix $\sigma(r)$. $$\|\sigma(r)\|= \left\| \begin{array}{c|ccc} \delta_0^2(r) 0 \ldots 0\\ \hline 0 \delta_1^2(r)E_{n_1} \ldots 0 \\ \hline \vdots \ddots \vdots \\ \hline 0 0 \ldots \delta_k^2(r)E_{n_k} \end{array}\right\|. $$ The coefficients of this matrix are $C^1$-smooth, and let's $\Sigma(r)$ will stand for its determinant. Actually, we can easily calculate it: $$\Sigma(r)=\det\|\sigma(r)\|=\delta_0^2(r)\delta_1^{2n_1}(r)\cdots\delta_k^{2n_k}(r).$$ On the manifold $D$ we study the Laplace–Beltrami operator $$-\Delta=-\mathrm{div}\nabla$$ and the Schrödinger operator $$-\Delta=-\mathrm{div}\nabla+c(r).$$ With the mentioned metric transformation the Laplace–Beltrami operator will change to $$ -\widetilde{\Delta}=-\frac 1 {\sqrt{\Sigma}}\mathrm{div}(\sqrt{\Sigma}\sigma^{-1}\nabla). $$ Transformed Schrödinger operator we write as $\widetilde{L}=-\widetilde{\Delta}+c(r)$. Also we put $$ F(r)=c(r)+\left(\frac{s'(r)}{2s(r)}\right)' +\left(\frac{s'(r)}{2s(r)}\right)^2, $$ $$ \Phi(r)=\left(\frac{\delta'(r)}{2\delta(r)}\right)'+\frac{s'(r)\delta'(r)}{2s(r)\delta(r)} +\left(\frac{\delta'(r)}{2\delta(r)}\right)^2, $$ where $\delta(r)=\frac{\sqrt{\Sigma(r)}}{\delta_0(r)}$. Then we get the following theorem. Theorem. Let's $F(r)+\Phi(r)>-C \ (C=\mathrm{const}>0)$. The spectrum of the Schrödinger operator $\widetilde{L}$ on the manifold $D$ is discrete if and only if $$\forall \omega>0\quad\lim_{r\to\infty}\int\limits_r^{r+\omega}(F(r)+\Phi(r))dr=+\infty.$$ And next we come to the following corollary. Corollary. If the Schrodinger operator $L$ on manifold $D$ has discrete spectrum, and we transform the metric of $D$ with some diagonal matrix $\|\sigma(r)\|$, and $\Phi(r)>\mathrm{const}$, then the Schrödinger operator $\widetilde{L}$ has discrete spectrum too. The same way non-discrete spectrum holds this characteristic.

Détail

Keywords: spectrum discreteness, Schrödinger operator, Riemannian manifolds, quasimodel manifolds, warped products.

Bibliographie

[1] A.\;V. Svetlov, “Disreteness of the Spectrum for the Laplace–Beltrami Operator and Metric Transformation on Manifold”, Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Mathematics. Physics, 2009, no. 12, 45–51

[2] A.\;V. Svetlov, “A Discreteness Criterion for the Spectrum of the Laplace–Beltrami Operator on Quasimodel Manifolds”, Siberian Mathematical Journal, 43:6 (2002), 1362–1371 | MR | Zbl

[3] A.\;V. Svetlov, “On Spectrum of Schrodinger Operator on Manifold of a Special Type”, Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Matematika. Mekhanika. Informatika, 14:4 (2) (2014), 584–589 | Zbl

[4] A.\;V. Svetlov, “The Spectrum of the Schrödinger Operator on the Warped Products”, Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Mathematics. Physics, 2002, no. 7, 12–19

[5] A.\;V. Svetlov, “Discreteness Conditions for the Spectrum of the Schrödinger Operator”, Trudy po geometrii i analizu, Izd-vo in-ta matematiki, Novosibirsk, 2003, 376–383

[6] L. Saloff-Coste, “Uniformly elliptic operators on Riemannian manifolds”, J. Diff. Geom., 36 (1992), 417–450 | DOI | MR | Zbl