Geodesic
On the relation between earthquake and atmospheric electricity
Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiziko-matematičeskie nauki, no. 2 (2017), pp. 99-110 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

The change in the magnitude of the atmospheric electric field (AEF) before the earthquake and immediately after it, according to our model, is due to the fact that the protons of water atmospheric complexes turn out to be quantum-entangled to protons of hydrogen bonds (HB) in lithosphere material. After the establishment of the quantum entanglement regime in the system, a decoherence follows. It manifests itself in AEF change, and then there is a recoherence, during which the quantum entanglement of the largest possible number of elements in the system with HB which ends with a new decoherence, is again tuned in the system. It is during this process that a shock wave or an earthquake entailing the change of AEF magnitude is generated.
Keywords: earthquake, atmospheric electric field
Mots-clés : quantum entanglement. 
@article{VKAM_2017_2_a9,
     author = {V. V. Kuznetsov},
     title = {On the relation between earthquake and atmospheric electricity},
     journal = {Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiziko-matemati\v{c}eskie nauki},
     pages = {99--110},
     year = {2017},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VKAM_2017_2_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. V. Kuznetsov
TI  - On the relation between earthquake and atmospheric electricity
JO  - Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiziko-matematičeskie nauki
PY  - 2017
SP  - 99
EP  - 110
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VKAM_2017_2_a9/
LA  - ru
ID  - VKAM_2017_2_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. V. Kuznetsov
%T On the relation between earthquake and atmospheric electricity
%J Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiziko-matematičeskie nauki
%D 2017
%P 99-110
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VKAM_2017_2_a9/
%G ru
%F VKAM_2017_2_a9
V. V. Kuznetsov. On the relation between earthquake and atmospheric electricity. Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiziko-matematičeskie nauki, no. 2 (2017), pp. 99-110. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/VKAM_2017_2_a9/

[1] Ognennye priznaki tragedij, Neverojatnyj mir, SPb, 76 pp.

[2] Rulenko O. P., “Operativnye predvestniki zemletrjasenij v jelektrichestve prizemnoj atmosfery”, Vulkanologija i sejsmologija, 2000, no. 4, 57-68

[3] Roder H., Braun T., Schuhmann W. et al., “Great Sumatra earthquake registers on electrostatic sensor”, EOS. Trans. AGU, 86:45 (2005), 445-460 | DOI

[4] Kuznecov V. V., Homutov S. Ju., “Rezul'taty nabljudenij atmosfernogo jelektrichestva, geomagnitnogo polja i infrazvuka v period aftershokovoj aktivnosti Chujskogo zemletrjasenija (Altaj, 27.09.2003)”, Jelektronnyj nauchno-informacionnyj zhurnal, 2005, no. 1(23)

[5] Kuznecov V. V., “Udarno-volnovaja model' zemletrjasenija. Sil'nye dvizhenija zemletrjasenija kak vyhod udarnoj volny na poverhnost'”, Fizicheskaja mezomehanika, 12:6 (2009), 87-96

[6] Kuznecov V. V., “Atmosfernoe jelektricheskoe pole vo vremja polnogo solnechnogo zatmenija 2008 g”, DAN, 2010, no. 435, 102–106

[7] Sonner J., “Holographic Schwinger effect and the geometry of entanglement”, Phys. Rev. Lett, 111 (2013), 211603 | DOI

[8] Bunity R. V., Hsu S. D. H., “Everything is entangled”, Phys. Lett, 718:2 (2012), 233-236 | DOI | MR

[9] Vershinin E. F., Buzevich A. V., Yumoto K et al., “Correlations of seismic activity with electromagnetic emissions and variations in Kamchatka region”, Atmospheric and ionospheric electromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes, eds. M. Hayakawa, Terra Scientific Publ. Comp, Tokio, 1999, 513-517

[10] Kupcov A. V., Osobennosti vysokochastotnoj geoakusticheskoj jemissii na zakljuchitel'noj stadii podgotovki zemletrjasenija, Kandidatskaja dissertacija, IKIR DVO RAN, 2006

[11] Rulenko O. P., Marapulec Ju. V., Kuz'min Ju. D., Solodchuk A. A., “Sovmestnoe vozmushhenie geoakusticheskogo, jemanacionnogo i atmosfernogo jelektricheskogo polej u granicy zemnaja kora – atmosfera pered zemletrjaseniem”, Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiz.-mat. nauki, 2016, no. 3(14), 72-78

[12] Kuznecova N. D., Kuznecov V. V., “Chto «pokazyvaet» shtormglass”, ZhFNN, 3:9 (2015), 6-12

[13] Gvozdarev A. Ju., “Reakcija shtormglassa na sejsmicheskie sobytija. Altajskoe zemletrjasenie”, Trudy konferencii, Gorno-Altajsk, 148-150

[14] Kuznecov V. V., O vozmozhnosti vozniknovenija udarnoj volny v rezul'tate kvantovyh jeffektov na protonah vodorodnyh svjazej v gornyh porodah, Doklad na seminare IGiL SO RAN «Akustika neodnorodnyh sred», 2009

[15] Kuznecov V. V., “Udarno-volnovaja model' zemletrjasenija. Formirovanie udarnoj volny. Fizika ochaga i aftershokov”, Kvantovaja Magija, 8:2 (2011), 2125-2151

[16] Kuznecov V. V., “Udarnaja volna v ionosfere v moment zemletrjasenija”, Vestnik KRAUNC. Fiz.-mat. nauki, 2016, no. 3(14), 64-71

[17] Doronin S. I., Kvantovaja magija, 2007

[18] Shkiljov V.D., O cifrah i fraktalah s pozicii kvantovoj mehaniki

[19] Pikovski I., Zych M., Costa F., Brukner Č., “Universal decoherence due to gravitational time dilation”, Nature Physics, 2015, no. 11, 668–672 | DOI