On the number of observations necessary for the distinction between two proximate hypotheses
Teoriâ veroâtnostej i ee primeneniâ, Tome 12 (1967) no. 3, pp. 575-582

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The problem of distinction between the following two proximate hypotheses $\mathbf H_0$: the population density is equal to $p_0(x)$ and $\mathbf H_\alpha$: the population density is equal to $p_\alpha(x)$, where $p_\alpha(x)\to p_0(x)$ as $\alpha\to0$, using the results of independent observations is considered. In the case when $\alpha$ is a one dimensional parameter the Petrov–Aivazyan formula [1] for the number of observations nesessary for the distinction between hypotheses $\mathbf H_0$ and $\mathbf H_\alpha$ according to the Neumann–Pearson criterion with given probabilities of errors of the first $(\varepsilon)$ and second $(\omega)$ type is improved up to the members of order $O(1)$. A possibility of application of the results of this article to the problem of testing the hypotheses on the types of distributions given a large number of small simples is demonstrated by the example of the distinction between two gamma-types.
@article{TVP_1967_12_3_a19,
     author = {I. N. Volodin},
     title = {On the number of observations necessary for the distinction between two proximate hypotheses},
     journal = {Teori\^a vero\^atnostej i ee primeneni\^a},
     pages = {575--582},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {12},
     number = {3},
     year = {1967},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TVP_1967_12_3_a19/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - I. N. Volodin
TI  - On the number of observations necessary for the distinction between two proximate hypotheses
JO  - Teoriâ veroâtnostej i ee primeneniâ
PY  - 1967
SP  - 575
EP  - 582
VL  - 12
IS  - 3
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TVP_1967_12_3_a19/
LA  - ru
ID  - TVP_1967_12_3_a19
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A I. N. Volodin
%T On the number of observations necessary for the distinction between two proximate hypotheses
%J Teoriâ veroâtnostej i ee primeneniâ
%D 1967
%P 575-582
%V 12
%N 3
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TVP_1967_12_3_a19/
%G ru
%F TVP_1967_12_3_a19
I. N. Volodin. On the number of observations necessary for the distinction between two proximate hypotheses. Teoriâ veroâtnostej i ee primeneniâ, Tome 12 (1967) no. 3, pp. 575-582. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TVP_1967_12_3_a19/