Geodesic
Soliton solutions of classical equations of motions in the modified formulation of the Yang–Mills theory
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 184 (2015) no. 3, pp. 520-529

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

We show that soliton solutions of classical field equations exist in the modified formulation of the Yang–Mills theory, which produces the same formal perturbation theory as the standard formulation.
Mots-clés : soliton
Keywords: gauge field, Yang–Mills theory. 
A. A. Slavnov. Soliton solutions of classical equations of motions in the modified formulation of the Yang–Mills theory. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 184 (2015) no. 3, pp. 520-529. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2015_184_3_a16/
@article{TMF_2015_184_3_a16,
     author = {A. A. Slavnov},
     title = {Soliton solutions of classical equations of motions in the~modified formulation of {the~Yang{\textendash}Mills} theory},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {520--529},
     year = {2015},
     volume = {184},
     number = {3},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2015_184_3_a16/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. A. Slavnov
TI  - Soliton solutions of classical equations of motions in the modified formulation of the Yang–Mills theory
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 2015
SP  - 520
EP  - 529
VL  - 184
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2015_184_3_a16/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_2015_184_3_a16
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. A. Slavnov
%T Soliton solutions of classical equations of motions in the modified formulation of the Yang–Mills theory
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 2015
%P 520-529
%V 184
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2015_184_3_a16/
%G ru
%F TMF_2015_184_3_a16

[1] S. Coleman, Commun. Math. Phys., 55:2 (1977), 113–116 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] S. Deser, Phys. Lett. B, 64:4 (1976), 463–464 | DOI

[3] H. Pagels, Phys. Lett. B, 68:5 (1977), 466 | DOI | MR

[4] A. A. Slavnov, JHEP, 08 (2008), 047, 11 pp., arXiv: 0807.1795 | DOI | MR

[5] A. A. Slavnov, TMF, 161:2 (2009), 204–211 | DOI | DOI | MR | Zbl

[6] A. Quadri, A. A. Slavnov, JHEP, 07 (2010), 87 | DOI | MR

[7] V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys. B, 139:1–2 (1978), 1–19 | DOI | MR

[8] I. Singer, Commun. Math. Phys., 60:1 (1978), 7–12 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[9] G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B, 79:2 (1974), 276–284 | DOI

[10] A. M. Polyakov, Pisma v ZhETF, 20:3 (1974), 430–433

[11] P. W. Higgs, Phys. Lett., 12:2 (1964), 132–133 ; Phys. Rev., 145:4 (1966), 1156–1163 | DOI | DOI | MR

[12] F. Englert, R. Brout, Phys. Lett., 13:9 (1964), 321–323 | DOI | MR

[13] A. Kvadri, A. A. Slavnov, TMF, 166:3 (2011), 336–349 | DOI | DOI

[14] B. Julia, A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D, 11:8 (1975), 2227–2232 | DOI

[15] M. K. Prasad, C. N. Sommerfield, Phys. Rev. Lett., 35:12 (1975), 760–762 | DOI

[16] E. B. Bogomolnyi, YaF, 24:4 (1976), 861–870 | MR