Geodesic
A Simplified Model for Monopole Catalysis of Nucleon Decay
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 128 (2001) no. 3, pp. 361-377 
Y. Brihaye; V. A. Rubakov; F. Zimmerschied; T. Tchrakian. A Simplified Model for Monopole Catalysis of Nucleon Decay. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 128 (2001) no. 3, pp. 361-377. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2001_128_3_a2/
@article{TMF_2001_128_3_a2,
     author = {Y. Brihaye and V. A. Rubakov and F. Zimmerschied and T. Tchrakian},
     title = {A {Simplified} {Model} for {Monopole} {Catalysis} of {Nucleon} {Decay}},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {361--377},
     year = {2001},
     volume = {128},
     number = {3},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2001_128_3_a2/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Y. Brihaye
AU  - V. A. Rubakov
AU  - F. Zimmerschied
AU  - T. Tchrakian
TI  - A Simplified Model for Monopole Catalysis of Nucleon Decay
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 2001
SP  - 361
EP  - 377
VL  - 128
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2001_128_3_a2/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_2001_128_3_a2
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Y. Brihaye
%A V. A. Rubakov
%A F. Zimmerschied
%A T. Tchrakian
%T A Simplified Model for Monopole Catalysis of Nucleon Decay
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 2001
%P 361-377
%V 128
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_2001_128_3_a2/
%G ru
%F TMF_2001_128_3_a2

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

We present a simple model where a nucleon is treated as a skyrmion, both the monopole and skyrmion are smooth solutions of the classical field equations, the baryon number nonconservation is explicitly built in and is due to the classical analogue of the triangle anomaly, and there is no necessity to consider leptons. We show by numerical analysis that there are no static classical solutions with a nonzero baryon number on top of the monopole, i.e., that the monopole catalysis of skyrmion decay indeed proceeds classically.

[1] V. A. Rubakov, Pisma v ZhETF, 33 (1981), 658; V. A. Rubakov, Nucl. Phys. B, 203 (1982), 311 | DOI

[2] C. G. Callan, Phys. Rev. D, 25 (1982), 2141 ; 26 (1982), 2058 ; Nucl. Phys. B, 212 (1983), 391 | DOI | DOI | DOI

[3] C. G. Callan and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B, 239 (1984), 161 | DOI | MR

[4] T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 260 (1961), 127 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] G. S. Adkins, C. R. Nappi, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B, 228 (1983), 552 | DOI | MR

[6] I. Zahed and G. E. Brown, Phys. Rep. C, 142 (1986), 1 | DOI | MR

[7] E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B, 223 (1983), 422 ; 433 | DOI | MR | MR

[8] E. D'Hoker and E. Farhi, Phys. Lett. B, 134 (1984), 86 | DOI | MR

[9] V. Rubakov, Nucl. Phys. B, 256 (1985), 509 | DOI

[10] J. Ambjørn and V. A. Rubakov, Nucl. Phys. B, 256 (1985), 434 | DOI

[11] E. B. Bogomolnyi, M. S. Marinov, YaF, 23 (1976), 676

[12] I. Affleck, Nucl. Phys. B, 191 (1981), 429 | DOI

[13] T. Akiba, H. Kikuchi, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D, 38 (1988), 1937 | DOI

[14] Y. Brihaye, B. Kleihaus, and D. H. Tchrakian, J. Math. Phys., 40 (1999), 1136 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[15] B. Kleihaus, D. H. Tchrakian, and F. Zimmerschied, J. Math. Phys., 41 (2000), 816 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[16] J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett., 47 (1981), 986 | DOI | MR