Geodesic
Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: a critique to Bell
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 99 (1994) no. 2, pp. 285-291 
Claudio Garola. Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: a critique to Bell. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 99 (1994) no. 2, pp. 285-291. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1994_99_2_a14/
@article{TMF_1994_99_2_a14,
     author = {Claudio Garola},
     title = {Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: a~critique to {Bell}},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {285--291},
     year = {1994},
     volume = {99},
     number = {2},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1994_99_2_a14/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Claudio Garola
TI  - Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: a critique to Bell
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1994
SP  - 285
EP  - 291
VL  - 99
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1994_99_2_a14/
LA  - en
ID  - TMF_1994_99_2_a14
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Claudio Garola
%T Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: a critique to Bell
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1994
%P 285-291
%V 99
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1994_99_2_a14/
%G en
%F TMF_1994_99_2_a14

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

A Metatheoretical Generalized Principle (MGP) is stated that formalizes an operational non-standard way of looking at the laws of physics. In Quantum Physics MGP leads to the invalidation of Bell's Inequality without renouncing to a minimal form of realism or to locality. Therefore the violation of Bell's Inequality predicted by Quantum Physics does not appear paradoxical if MGP is accepted.

[1] Bell J. S., “On the Einstein Podolski Rosen Paradox”, Physics, 1 (1964)

[2] Bohm D., Quantum Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951

[3] Bohm D., Aharonov Y., “Discussion of Experimental Proofs for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky”, Phys. Rev. (2), 108 (1957), 1070–1076 | DOI | MR

[4] Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N., “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete?”, Phys. Rev., 47 (1935) | DOI | Zbl

[5] Furry W. H., “Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement”, Phys. Rev., 49 (1936)

[6] Furry W. H., “Remarks on Measurements in Quantum Theory”, Phys. Rev., 49 (1936)

[7] Garola C., “Classical Foundations of Quantum Logic”, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys., 30 (1991) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[8] Garola C., “Semantic Incompleteness of Quantum Physics”, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys., 31 (1992) | MR

[9] Garola C., “Truth Versus Testability in Quantum Logic”, Erkenntnis, 37 (1992) | DOI | MR

[10] Garola C., “Semantic Incompleteness of Quantum Physics and EPR-like Paradoxes”, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys., 32 (1993) | MR

[11] Garola C., Criticizing Bell: Local Realism and Quantum Physics Reconciled, preprint UL/DF-93, 1993 | MR

[12] Sakurai J. J., Modern Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, Reading (Mass.), 1985

[13] Selleri F., “History of the Einstein–Podolski–Rosen Paradox”, Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism, ed. F. Selleri, Plenum Press, New York, 1988 | DOI | MR

[14] Wigner E. P., “On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Probabilities”, Am. Journ. of Phys., 38 (1970)