Geodesic
Supersymmetric chiral boson with linearly realized self-duality condition
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 92 (1992) no. 1, pp. 77-84 
A. A. Deriglazov. Supersymmetric chiral boson with linearly realized self-duality condition. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 92 (1992) no. 1, pp. 77-84. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1992_92_1_a5/
@article{TMF_1992_92_1_a5,
     author = {A. A. Deriglazov},
     title = {Supersymmetric chiral boson with linearly realized self-duality condition},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {77--84},
     year = {1992},
     volume = {92},
     number = {1},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1992_92_1_a5/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. A. Deriglazov
TI  - Supersymmetric chiral boson with linearly realized self-duality condition
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1992
SP  - 77
EP  - 84
VL  - 92
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1992_92_1_a5/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_1992_92_1_a5
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. A. Deriglazov
%T Supersymmetric chiral boson with linearly realized self-duality condition
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1992
%P 77-84
%V 92
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1992_92_1_a5/
%G ru
%F TMF_1992_92_1_a5

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

Two supersymmetric versions for the theory of a chiral boson with linearly realized self-duality condition are proposed. In both cases the sector of physical states after canonical quantization contains only modes propagating to the left. The first version describes a chiral boson and its superpartner; the second does not contain nontrivial Fermi degrees of freedom. Both actions are rewritten in a locally supersymmetric form by introducing an interaction with $(1,0)$ supergravity in the superfield and component forms.

[1] Gross D. J., Harvey J. A., Martinec E., Rohm R., Nucl. Phys. B, 256 (1985), 136 ; 267 (1986), 75 | DOI | MR | DOI | MR

[2] Floreanini R., Jackiw R., Phys. Rev. Lett., 59 (1987), 1873–1875 | DOI

[3] Sonnenschein J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 60 (1988), 1772 | DOI

[4] Bellucci S., Golterman M. F. L., Petcher D. N., Phys. Lett. B, 217 (1989), 289–293 | DOI | MR

[5] Lin Q.-g., Ni C.-j., Phys. Lett. B, 254 (1991), 435 | DOI

[6] Siegel W., Nucl. Phys. B, 238 (1984), 307–316 | DOI

[7] Henneaux M., Teitelboin C., Phys. Lett. B, 206 (1989), 650–653 | DOI | MR

[8] Depireux D. A., Gates S. J., Radak B., Phys. Lett. B, 236 (1990), 411–416 | DOI | MR

[9] Srivastava P. P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 63 (1989), 2791–2792 | DOI

[10] Gates S. J., Grisaru M. T., Mezincescu L., Townsend P. K., Nucl. Phys. B, 286 (1987), 1–26 | DOI | MR

[11] Evans M., Louis J., Ovrit B. A., Phys. Rev. D, 35 (1987), 3045–3059 | DOI | MR

[12] Dirak P. A. M., Lektsii po kvantovoi mekhanike, Mir, M., 1968