Geodesic
Propagator of Yang–Mills field in Hamiltonian Gauge
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 89 (1991) no. 2, pp. 238-245 
G. A. Kravtsova; A. A. Slavnov. Propagator of Yang–Mills field in Hamiltonian Gauge. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 89 (1991) no. 2, pp. 238-245. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1991_89_2_a7/
@article{TMF_1991_89_2_a7,
     author = {G. A. Kravtsova and A. A. Slavnov},
     title = {Propagator of {Yang{\textendash}Mills} field in {Hamiltonian} {Gauge}},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {238--245},
     year = {1991},
     volume = {89},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1991_89_2_a7/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - G. A. Kravtsova
AU  - A. A. Slavnov
TI  - Propagator of Yang–Mills field in Hamiltonian Gauge
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1991
SP  - 238
EP  - 245
VL  - 89
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1991_89_2_a7/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_1991_89_2_a7
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A G. A. Kravtsova
%A A. A. Slavnov
%T Propagator of Yang–Mills field in Hamiltonian Gauge
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1991
%P 238-245
%V 89
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1991_89_2_a7/
%G ru
%F TMF_1991_89_2_a7

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The arbitrariness of the choice of the propagator of the Yang–Mills field in the Hamiltonian gauge is considered. Transition from the Coulomb to the Hamiltonian gauge yields a class of propagators that includes both a translationally noninvariant propagator as well as one of the Mandelstam–Leibbrandt type.

[1] Slavnov A. A., Faddeev L. D., Vvedenie v kvantovuyu teoriyu kalibrovochnykh polei, Nauka, M., 1988 | MR | Zbl

[2] Caracciolo S., Curci G., Menotti P., Phys. Lett., 113B:4 (1982), 311–314 | DOI

[3] Slavnov A. A., Frolov S. A., TMF, 68:3 (1986), 360–367 | MR

[4] Kummer W., Acta Phys. Austr., 41:3–4 (1975), 315–334 | MR

[5] Konetshny W., Kummer W., Nucl. Phys., B100:1 (1975), 106–124 | DOI

[6] Willemsen J. F., Phys. Rev., 17:2 (1978), 574–584 | MR

[7] Dahmen H. D., Sholz B., Steiner F., Phys. Lett., 177B:5 (1982), 339–341 | DOI | MR

[8] Friedman J. L., Papastamatiou N. J., Nucl. Phys., B219:1 (1983), 125–142 | DOI

[9] Haller Kurt, Phys. Rev., D36:6 (1987), 1830–1838 | MR

[10] Haller Kurt, Phys. Rev., D36:6 (1987), 1839–1845 | MR

[11] Landshoff P. V., Phys. Lett., 227B:3–4 (1989), 427–430 | DOI | MR

[12] James K. A., Landshoff P. V., Phys. Lett., 251B:1 (1990), 167–174

[13] Leibbrandt G., Nucl. Phys., B310:2 (1988), 405–427 | DOI | MR

[14] Leibbrandt G., Introduction to Noncovariant Gauges, Preprint Mathematical Series No 108, Univ. of Guelph, Ontario, 1986 | MR

[15] Leibbrandt G., Unified-gauge formalism at two loops for a class of physical gauge, Preprint CERN-TH. 5588/89

[16] Frolov S. A., BRST-kvantovanie kalibrovochnykh teorii vo vremeni-podobnykh kalibrovkakh, Preprint No 8, MIAN, M., 1989

[17] Sholz B., Steiner F., Path Integral Quantization in the Temporal Gauge, Preprint DESY, 83-055, Hamburg, 1983

[18] Slavnov A. A., Frolov S. A., TMF, 73:2 (1987), 199–209 | MR