Geodesic
Markov limit for a quantum particle interacting with a Fermi gas
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 79 (1989) no. 2, pp. 263-271 
A. Sh. Domnenkov. Markov limit for a quantum particle interacting with a Fermi gas. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 79 (1989) no. 2, pp. 263-271. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1989_79_2_a9/
@article{TMF_1989_79_2_a9,
     author = {A. Sh. Domnenkov},
     title = {Markov limit for a~quantum particle interacting with {a~Fermi} gas},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {263--271},
     year = {1989},
     volume = {79},
     number = {2},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1989_79_2_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. Sh. Domnenkov
TI  - Markov limit for a quantum particle interacting with a Fermi gas
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1989
SP  - 263
EP  - 271
VL  - 79
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1989_79_2_a9/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_1989_79_2_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. Sh. Domnenkov
%T Markov limit for a quantum particle interacting with a Fermi gas
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1989
%P 263-271
%V 79
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1989_79_2_a9/
%G ru
%F TMF_1989_79_2_a9

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

A quantum particle interacting with the Fermi gas is studied. The interaction represents the analogue of the dipole approximation to the interaction between the atom and electromagnetic field. Existence of the weak interaction limit is proved which is described by the quantum-dynamical semi-group on the observable algebra. The structure of this semi-group and the convergence to the equilibrium state is investigated and the uniqueness of the invariant state is proved.

[1] Davies E. B., Commun. Math. Phys., 27 (1972), 309–325 | DOI | MR

[2] Davies E. B., Commun. Math. Phys., 33 (1973), 171–182 | DOI | MR

[3] Davies E. B., Commun. Math. Phys., 39 (1974), 91–110 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[4] Davies E. B., J. Math. Phys., 15 (1974), 2036–2039 | DOI | MR

[5] Davies E. B., J. Math. Phys., 20 (1979), 345–351 | DOI | MR

[6] Pule J. V., Commun. Math. Phys., 38 (1974), 241–256 | DOI | MR

[7] Frigerio A., Gorini V., J. Math. Phys., 17 (1976), 2123–2127 | DOI | MR

[8] Gorini V., Kossakowski A., J. Math. Phys., 17 (1976), 1298–1301 | DOI | MR

[9] Palmer P. F., J. Math. Phys., 18 (1977), 527–529 | DOI | MR

[10] Spohn H., Rev. Mod. Phys., 52 (1980), 569–615 | DOI | MR

[11] Davies E. B., Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, 91 (1978), 1–83

[12] Lindblad G., Commun. Math. Phys., 48 (1976), 119–130 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] Evans D. E., Commun. Math. Phys., 70 (1979), 53–68 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[14] Bratteli O., Robinson D., Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics, V. II, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1981 | MR | Zbl

[15] Arai A., J. Math. Phys., 22 (1981), 534–537 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[16] Botvich D. D., Malyshev V. A., Commun. Math. Phys., 91 (1983), 301–312 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[17] Khepp K., Teoriya perenormirovok, Nauka, M., 1974 | MR

[18] Rid M., Saimon B., Metody sovremennoi matematicheskoi fiziki, T. 3, Mir, M., 1978 | MR