Geodesic
Heisenberg fields in the neighborhood of a classical solution
Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 68 (1986) no. 3, pp. 338-349 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

For the example of nonlinear models of a scalar field in two-dimensional space-time a study is made of a method of quantization in the neighborhood of a classical solution based on direct solution by perturbation theory of the Cauchy problem for the Heisenberg field equations. It is shown that, as in the classical Bogolyubov–Krylov method, zero modes and associated secular terms arise because of the perturbation-theory expansion of the Bogolyubov operator argument of the classical component. The Lehmann–Symanzik–Zimmermann procedure is used to make a complete investigation of the asymptotic states of the field in the soliton sector in the lowest orders of perturbation theory. 
@article{TMF_1986_68_3_a1,
     author = {V. B. Tverskoi},
     title = {Heisenberg fields in the neighborhood of a~classical solution},
     journal = {Teoreti\v{c}eska\^a i matemati\v{c}eska\^a fizika},
     pages = {338--349},
     year = {1986},
     volume = {68},
     number = {3},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1986_68_3_a1/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. B. Tverskoi
TI  - Heisenberg fields in the neighborhood of a classical solution
JO  - Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
PY  - 1986
SP  - 338
EP  - 349
VL  - 68
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1986_68_3_a1/
LA  - ru
ID  - TMF_1986_68_3_a1
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. B. Tverskoi
%T Heisenberg fields in the neighborhood of a classical solution
%J Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika
%D 1986
%P 338-349
%V 68
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1986_68_3_a1/
%G ru
%F TMF_1986_68_3_a1
V. B. Tverskoi. Heisenberg fields in the neighborhood of a classical solution. Teoretičeskaâ i matematičeskaâ fizika, Tome 68 (1986) no. 3, pp. 338-349. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/TMF_1986_68_3_a1/

[1] Matsumoto H., Umezawa H., Papastamatiou N., Phys. Rev., 28:6 (1983), 1434–1439 | MR

[2] Sveshnikov K. A., TMF, 55:3 (1983), 361–384 | MR

[3] Verschelde H., Phariseau P., Z. Phys. C, 23:3 (1984), 181–190 | DOI | MR

[4] Bogolyubov N. N., UMZh, 2:2 (1950), 3–24 | MR | Zbl

[5] Solodovnikova E. P., Tavkhelidze A. N., Khrustalev O. A., TMF, 11:3 (1972), 317–330

[6] Solodovnikova E. P., Tavkhelidze A. N., Khrustalev O. A., TMF, 12:2 (1972), 164–178

[7] Jakiw R., Rev. Mod. Phys., 49:3 (1977), 681–706 | DOI | MR

[8] Korepin V. E., Faddeev L. D., TMF, 25:2 (1975), 147–163 | MR

[9] Dashen R., Hasslacher B., Neveu A., Phys. Rev. D, 10:12 (1974), 4114–4148 | DOI

[10] Faddeev L. D., Korepin V. E., Phys. Rep., 42:1 (1978), 1–78 | DOI | MR

[11] Goldstone J., Jakiw R., Phys. Rev. D, 11:6 (1975), 1486–1505 | DOI | MR

[12] Razumov A. V., Khrustalev O. A., TMF, 29:3 (1976), 300–308 | MR

[13] Tomboulis E., Phys. Rev. D, 12:6 (1975), 1678–1683 | DOI

[14] Razumov A. V., TMF, 30:1 (1977), 18–27 | MR

[15] Steinmann O., Nucl. Phys. B, 145:1 (1978), 141–165 | DOI | MR

[16] Tverskoi V. B., TMF, 59:2 (1984), 200–208 | MR

[17] Mescheryakov D. V., TMF, 61:3 (1984), 378–386 | MR

[18] Semenoff G., Matsumoto H., Umezawa H., J. Math. Phys., 22:10 (1981), 2208–2220 | DOI | MR