Comparison between Principal Component Analysis and Formal Concept Analysis of Repertory Grids
Séminaire lotharingien de combinatoire, Tome 22 (1989)
Voir la notice de l'acte provenant de la source Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire website
We give a first comparison between the Principal Component Analysis PCA ("one of the oldest and best known techniques of multivari- ate analysis" according to I.T. Jolliffe) and a very young algebraic technique for the visualization of data namely the Formal Concept Analysis FCA by applying both methods to Repertory-Grid-Tests. We demonstrate the efficiency of these methods using the a particular grid of a 24 years old patient suffering from bulimia nervosa.
@article{SLC_1989_22_a14,
author = {Norbert Spangenberg and Karl Erich Wolff},
title = {Comparison between {Principal} {Component} {Analysis} and {Formal} {Concept} {Analysis} of {Repertory} {Grids}},
journal = {S\'eminaire lotharingien de combinatoire},
publisher = {mathdoc},
volume = {22},
year = {1989},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/SLC_1989_22_a14/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Norbert Spangenberg AU - Karl Erich Wolff TI - Comparison between Principal Component Analysis and Formal Concept Analysis of Repertory Grids JO - Séminaire lotharingien de combinatoire PY - 1989 VL - 22 PB - mathdoc UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/SLC_1989_22_a14/ ID - SLC_1989_22_a14 ER -
Norbert Spangenberg; Karl Erich Wolff. Comparison between Principal Component Analysis and Formal Concept Analysis of Repertory Grids. Séminaire lotharingien de combinatoire, Tome 22 (1989). http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/SLC_1989_22_a14/