Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
@article{SJIM_2003_6_2_a7,
author = {M. S. Osadchii},
title = {The paradox of planned obsolescence},
journal = {Sibirskij \v{z}urnal industrialʹnoj matematiki},
pages = {81--94},
publisher = {mathdoc},
volume = {6},
number = {2},
year = {2003},
language = {ru},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/SJIM_2003_6_2_a7/}
}
M. S. Osadchii. The paradox of planned obsolescence. Sibirskij žurnal industrialʹnoj matematiki, Tome 6 (2003) no. 2, pp. 81-94. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/SJIM_2003_6_2_a7/
[1] Mason R., “Network externalities and the Coase conjecture”, Europ. Econ. Rev., 44 (2000), 1981–1992 | DOI
[2] Swan P., “Optimum durability, second-hand markets, and planned obsolescence”, J. Polit. Economy, 80 (1972), 575–585 | DOI
[3] Swan P., “Durability of consumption goods”, Amer. Econ. Rev., 60 (1970), 884–894
[4] Sieper E., Swan P., “Monopoly and competition in the market for durable goods”, Rev. Econ. Studies, 40 (1973), 333–351 | DOI
[5] Bulow J., “Durable-goods monopolists”, J. Polit. Economy, 90 (1982), 314–332 | DOI
[6] Bulow J., “An economic theory of planned obsolescence”, Quarterly J. Economics, 101:4 (1986), 729–750 | DOI
[7] Osadchii M. S., “Dinamicheskaya monopoliya i konkurentsiya na rynke tovarov dlitelnogo polzovaniya”, Sib. zhurn. industr. matematiki, 5:4(12) (2002), 92–109 | MR
[8] Stokey N. L., “Rational expectations and durable goods pricing”, Bell J. Economics, 12:1 (1981), 112–128 | DOI | MR
[9] Karp L. S., “Monopoly extraction of a durable non-renewable resource: failure of the Coase conjecture”, Economica, 60 (1993), 1–11 | DOI
[10] Coase R. H., “Durability and monopoly”, J. Law and Economics, 15 (1972), 143–149 | DOI
[11] Kahn C., “Durable goods monopolist and consistency with increasing costs”, Econometrica, 54:2 (1986), 275–294 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[12] Pontryagin L. S., Boltyanskii V. G., Gamkrelidze R. V., Mischenko E. F., Matematicheskaya teoriya optimalnykh protsessov, Nauka, M., 1969