Geodesic
Differenze nella proiezione somatosensoriale ai due campi citoarchitettonici (aree 6 e 4) della corteccia motrice del Gatto
Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti della Classe di scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali, Série 8, Tome 62 (1977) no. 6, pp. 859-865 
Cesari, Roberto; Michelini, Sandro; Spidalieri, Giuseppe; Vedovato, Marta. Differenze nella proiezione somatosensoriale ai due campi citoarchitettonici (aree 6 e 4) della corteccia motrice del Gatto. Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti della Classe di scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali, Série 8, Tome 62 (1977) no. 6, pp. 859-865. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/RLINA_1977_8_62_6_a22/
@article{RLINA_1977_8_62_6_a22,
     author = {Cesari, Roberto and Michelini, Sandro and Spidalieri, Giuseppe and Vedovato, Marta},
     title = {Differenze nella proiezione somatosensoriale ai due campi citoarchitettonici (aree 6 e 4) della corteccia motrice del {Gatto}},
     journal = {Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti della Classe di scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali},
     pages = {859--865},
     year = {1977},
     volume = {Ser. 8, 62},
     number = {6},
     language = {it},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/RLINA_1977_8_62_6_a22/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cesari, Roberto
AU  - Michelini, Sandro
AU  - Spidalieri, Giuseppe
AU  - Vedovato, Marta
TI  - Differenze nella proiezione somatosensoriale ai due campi citoarchitettonici (aree 6 e 4) della corteccia motrice del Gatto
JO  - Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti della Classe di scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali
PY  - 1977
SP  - 859
EP  - 865
VL  - 62
IS  - 6
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/RLINA_1977_8_62_6_a22/
LA  - it
ID  - RLINA_1977_8_62_6_a22
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Cesari, Roberto
%A Michelini, Sandro
%A Spidalieri, Giuseppe
%A Vedovato, Marta
%T Differenze nella proiezione somatosensoriale ai due campi citoarchitettonici (aree 6 e 4) della corteccia motrice del Gatto
%J Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti della Classe di scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali
%D 1977
%P 859-865
%V 62
%N 6
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/RLINA_1977_8_62_6_a22/
%G it
%F RLINA_1977_8_62_6_a22

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Biblioteca Digitale Italiana di Matematica

The peripheral reactivity of cortical area 6 ($6 \alpha\beta$) of the Cat has been examined, in order to compare its features with those of the peripheral reactivity of area 4 ($4 \gamma$). Peripheral stimulation was actuated by single shocks to the skin applied in sequence by means of several needle-electrodes thrust into standard locations of limbs, trunk, neck and of the whisker region. With conventional electrophysiological techniques, in 19 animals extracellular records from 323 cortical neurones were obtained, 258 of which belonged to area $6 \alpha\beta$ (214 in chloralose-anaesthetized and 44 in locally-anaesthetized preparations) and 65 to area $4 \gamma$ (chloralosed preparations). Only excitatory, all-or-none responses were studied. In chloralosed preparations, the proportion of reactive units appeared to be lower in area 6 (26.6%) than in area 4 (58.5%). In both cortical areas, most reactive neurones (82.5% in area 6; 76.3% in area 4) were endowed with wide PRFs, as judged by reactivity to more than one stimulating electrode. Those neurones exhibiting restricted fields, however, were generally activated by off-focus regions in area 6, and by on-focus regions in area 4. The overwhelming majority of neurones sampled from area 6 appeared to be undrivable by natural stimuli, while as many as 70 % of the units of area 4 reactive to electrical stimulation exhibited physiologically identifiable PRFs. In spite of some exceptions, the responses obtained from area 6 neurones exhibited a lower number of spikes and a mean latency longer than those observed on neurones pertaining to area 4. The peripheral reactivity of area 6 neurones sampled in the absence of chloralose was very low (3 units out of 44) and only present following electrical shocks.

[1] H. Asanuma (1973) - Cerebral cortical control of movement, «Physiologist», 16, 143.

[2] H. Asanuma (1975) - Recent developments in the study of the columnar arrangement of neurons within the motor cortex, «Physiol. Rev.», 55, 143.

[3] H. Asanuma e J. E. Ward (1971) - Patterns of contraction of distal forelimb muscles produced by intracortical stimulation in cats, «Brain Res.», 27, 97.

[4] V. B. Brooks e S. D. Stoney Jr. (1971) - Motor mechanisms: the role of the pyramidal system in motor control, «Ann. Rev. Physiol.», 33, 337.

[5] P. Buser e M. Imbert (1961) - Sensory projections to the motor cortex in cats: a microelectrode study. In Rosenblith W. A. (Ed.), «Sensory Communication», M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, pp. 607-626.

[6] H. Crevel Van e W. J. C. Verhaart (1963) - The ‘exact’ origin of the pyramidal tract. A quantitative study in the cat, «J. Anat.», 97, 495.

[7] J. M. R. Delgado (1952) - Hidden motor cortex of the cat, «Amer. J. Physiol.», 170, 673.

[8] E. V. Evarts e W. T. Thach (1969) - Motor mechanisms of CNS: cerebrocerebellar interactions, «Ann. Rev. Physiol.», 31, 451.

[9] R. Hassler (1966) - Extrapyramidal motor areas of cat's frontal lobe: their function and architectonic differentiation, «Int. J. Neurol.», 5, 301.

[10] R. Hassler e K. Muhs-Clement (1964) - Architektonischer aufbau der sensomotorischen und parietalen cortex der katze, «J. Hirnforsch», 6, 377.

[11] A. Nieoullon e L. Rispal-Padel (1976) - Somatotopic localization in cat motor cortex, «Brain Res.», 105, 405.

[12] R. Nyberg-Hansen (1969) - Further studies on the origin of cortico-spinal fibres in the cat. An experimental study with the Nauta method, «Brain Res.», 16, 39.

[13] J. K. Nyquist e A. L. Towe (1970) - Neuronal activity evoked in cat precruciate cortex by cutaneous stimulation, «Exp. Neurol.», 29, 494.

[14] K. Sakata e J. Miyamoto (1968) - Topographic relationship between the receptive fields of neurons in the motor cortex and the movements elicited by focal stimulation in freely moving cats, «Jap. J. Physiol.», 18, 489.

[15] A. L. Towe, D. Whitehorn e J. K. Nyquist (1968) - Differential activity among wide-field neurons of the cat postcruciate cerebral cortex, «Exp. Neurol.», 20, 497.

[16] J. W. Ward e S. L. Clark (1935-36) - Specific responses elicitable from subdivisions of the motor cortex of the cerebrum of the cat, «J. comp. Neurol.», 63, 48.

[17] C. N.Woolsey (1958) - Organization of somatic sensory and motor areas of the cerebral cortex. In Harlow H. R. e Woolsey C. N. (Eds.), «Biological and Biochemical Bases of Behavior», Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 63-82.