Why Should We Return to the Kiselev Schoolbook?
Matematičeskoe obrazovanie, Tome 38 (2006) no. 3, pp. 12-17.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The author describes some reasons to return to teaching math with the classical schoolbook by Kiselev which was popular in the first half of the XX-th century.
@article{MO_2006_38_3_a3,
     author = {I. P. Kostenko},
     title = {Why {Should} {We} {Return} to the {Kiselev} {Schoolbook?}},
     journal = {Matemati\v{c}eskoe obrazovanie},
     pages = {12--17},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {38},
     number = {3},
     year = {2006},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MO_2006_38_3_a3/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - I. P. Kostenko
TI  - Why Should We Return to the Kiselev Schoolbook?
JO  - Matematičeskoe obrazovanie
PY  - 2006
SP  - 12
EP  - 17
VL  - 38
IS  - 3
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MO_2006_38_3_a3/
LA  - ru
ID  - MO_2006_38_3_a3
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A I. P. Kostenko
%T Why Should We Return to the Kiselev Schoolbook?
%J Matematičeskoe obrazovanie
%D 2006
%P 12-17
%V 38
%N 3
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MO_2006_38_3_a3/
%G ru
%F MO_2006_38_3_a3
I. P. Kostenko. Why Should We Return to the Kiselev Schoolbook?. Matematičeskoe obrazovanie, Tome 38 (2006) no. 3, pp. 12-17. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MO_2006_38_3_a3/