Geodesic
Comparative analysis of methods for modeling the gravitational potential of complex shape bodies
Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 33 (2021) no. 5, pp. 78-90.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

Correct modeling of the celestial bodies gravitational field is the key problem for rendezvous, landing and research of these objects. There are a number of various methods for describing the gravitational field, each method has advantages and disadvantages. The paper considers and presents the comparative analysis results of the three most wellknown methods for representing the gravitational potential: the polyhedron model, the mascon model, and the spherical harmonics expansion. The approach for comparison of the accuracy and computational complexity of each method is suggested and realized. An asteroid of known shape and uniformly distributed mass is taken as the sample object. The analysis showed that the method of spherical harmonics expansion is computationally more advantageous when calculating the gravitational potential on a large number of trial points, but it is the least accurate of the three methods presented in the work. The mascon method on a small number of trial points takes the least time and has a higher accuracy. The polyhedron method is the most computationally expensive but it is the most accurate and can be used as a reference for calculating the gravitational potential for a homogeneous body.
Keywords: gravitational potential, polyhedron model, spherical harmonics expansion.
Mots-clés : mascon 
@article{MM_2021_33_5_a5,
     author = {A. S. Yuditskaya and S. S. Tkachev},
     title = {Comparative analysis of methods for modeling the gravitational potential of complex shape bodies},
     journal = {Matemati\v{c}eskoe modelirovanie},
     pages = {78--90},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {33},
     number = {5},
     year = {2021},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a5/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. S. Yuditskaya
AU  - S. S. Tkachev
TI  - Comparative analysis of methods for modeling the gravitational potential of complex shape bodies
JO  - Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
PY  - 2021
SP  - 78
EP  - 90
VL  - 33
IS  - 5
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a5/
LA  - ru
ID  - MM_2021_33_5_a5
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. S. Yuditskaya
%A S. S. Tkachev
%T Comparative analysis of methods for modeling the gravitational potential of complex shape bodies
%J Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
%D 2021
%P 78-90
%V 33
%N 5
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a5/
%G ru
%F MM_2021_33_5_a5
A. S. Yuditskaya; S. S. Tkachev. Comparative analysis of methods for modeling the gravitational potential of complex shape bodies. Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 33 (2021) no. 5, pp. 78-90. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a5/

[1] X. Zeng et al., “Study on the connection between the rotating mass dipole and natural elongated bodies”, Astrophys. Space Sci., 356:1 (2015), 29–42 | DOI

[2] V. I. Nikonov, Gravitatsionnye polia malykh nebesnykh tel, OOO Belyi veter, M., 2020, 68 pp.

[3] E. Herrera-Sucarrat, The full problem of two and three bodies: application to asteroids and binaries, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Surrey, Guildford, 2012

[4] J. L. Junkins, “Investigation of Finite-Element Representations of the Geopotential”, AIAA J., 14:6 (1976), 803–808 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] J. L. Junkins, G. W. Miller, J. R. Jancaitis, “A weighting function approach to modeling of irregular surfaces”, J. Geophys. Res., 78:11 (1973), 1794–1803 | DOI

[6] R. C. Engels, J. L. Junkins, “Local Representation of the Geopotential by Weighted Orthonormal Polynomials”, J. Guid. Control, 3:1 (1980), 55–61 | DOI | Zbl

[7] G. Beylkin, R. Cramer, “Toward multiresolution estimation and efficient representation of gravitational fields”, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 84:1 (2002), 87–104 | DOI | Zbl

[8] F. Lekien, J. Marsden, “Tricubic interpolation in three dimensions”, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 63:3 (2005), 455–471 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[9] A. Colombi, A. N. Hirani, B. F. Villac, “Adaptive Gravitational Force Representation for Fast Trajectory Propagation Near Small Bodies”, J. Guid. Control. Dyn., 31:4 (2008), 1041–1051 | DOI | MR

[10] R. A. Werner, “The gravitational potential of a homogeneous polyhedron or don't cut corners”, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 59:3 (1994), 253–278 | DOI | Zbl

[11] T. G. G. Chanut, S. Aljbaae, V. Carruba, “Mascon gravitation model using a shaped polyhedral source”, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 450:4 (2015), 3742–3749 | DOI

[12] D. Vallado, Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications, 1997, 945 pp. | MR

[13] 3D Asteroid Catalogue, (Access date: 11/15/2020) https://3d-asteroids.space/

[14] Gmsh, (Access date: 10/02/2020) https://gmsh.info/