Geodesic
Multi-anticipative car-following model with explicit reaction-time delay
Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 33 (2021) no. 5, pp. 35-46.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The microscopic car-following model with explicit reaction-time delay and several predecessors in interaction is presented. This model is based on the well-known optimal velocity approach. Multi-anticipation and human reaction time allow for the capturing of natural drivers’ behavior when identifying their longitudinal acceleration. The traffic behavior of the proposed model is investigated analytically and numerically. Linear stability on a ring is analyzed by introducing small disturbances into the homogeneous traffic flow. By increasing the number of leaders in interaction, the traffic flow stability is enhanced. As a result, the traffic jams can be reduced by introducing the more front interactions. Behavior of stop-and-go waves and the speed of its propagation are in a good agreement with the observations.
Keywords: microscopic traffic models, model with multiple predecessors, stability condition, equations with explicit delay. 
@article{MM_2021_33_5_a2,
     author = {V. V. Kurtc and I. E. Anufriev and D. O. Trufanov},
     title = {Multi-anticipative car-following model with explicit reaction-time delay},
     journal = {Matemati\v{c}eskoe modelirovanie},
     pages = {35--46},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {33},
     number = {5},
     year = {2021},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a2/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. V. Kurtc
AU  - I. E. Anufriev
AU  - D. O. Trufanov
TI  - Multi-anticipative car-following model with explicit reaction-time delay
JO  - Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
PY  - 2021
SP  - 35
EP  - 46
VL  - 33
IS  - 5
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a2/
LA  - ru
ID  - MM_2021_33_5_a2
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. V. Kurtc
%A I. E. Anufriev
%A D. O. Trufanov
%T Multi-anticipative car-following model with explicit reaction-time delay
%J Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
%D 2021
%P 35-46
%V 33
%N 5
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a2/
%G ru
%F MM_2021_33_5_a2
V. V. Kurtc; I. E. Anufriev; D. O. Trufanov. Multi-anticipative car-following model with explicit reaction-time delay. Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 33 (2021) no. 5, pp. 35-46. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_5_a2/

[1] A. V. Gasnikov, S. L. Klenov, E. A. Nurminskii, Ia. A. Kholodov, N. B. Shamrai, Vvedenie v matematicheskoe modelirovanie transportnykh potokov, Uch. pos., Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop., M., 2013, 428 pp.

[2] M. Treiber, A. Kesting, Traffic Flow Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, 2013, 503 pp. | MR

[3] F. Wageningen-Kessels, H. van Lint, K. Vuik, S. Hoogendoorn, “Genealogy of traffic flow models”, EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 4:4 (2015), 445–473 | DOI | MR

[4] San Francisco Dynamic Traffic Assignment Project “DTA Anyway”, Final Methodology Report, Parsons Brickerhoff San Francisco Country Transportation Authority, 2012

[5] L. Wismans et al., “Real time traffic models, decision support for traffic management”, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 22, 220–235 | DOI

[6] J. Chan, “Dynamic Traffic Assignment Modelling and Evaluation: A Case Study for the Sydney Region”, 34th Conference of Australian Institutes of Transport Research (2016)

[7] S. Erdogan, X. Zhou, J. Liu, “A Simplified Dynamic Traffic Assignment Framework for Statewide Traffic Modeling”, 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Washington, D.C., 2015)

[8] C. Wellander, Y. Dehghani, M. Bandy, A. Natzel, A. Lo, L. Wojcicki, “Using a DTA Model to Evaluate Road Tolling Strategies: Seattle Experience”, Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Washington, D.C., 2013)

[9] L. A. Pipes, “An operational analysis of the traffic dynamics”, Journal of applied physics, 24:3 (1953), 274–281 | DOI | MR

[10] G. F. Newell, “Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following”, Operations research, 9:2 (1961), 209–229 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[11] R. Jiang, Q. Wu, Z. Zhu, “Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory”, Physical Review E, 64:1 (2001), 017101, 4 pp. | DOI

[12] K. Nagel, “A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic”, J. Physique I France, 2 (1992), 2221–2229 | DOI | MR

[13] B. S. Kerner, The Physics of Traffic, Springer, Berlin, 2004, 632 pp.

[14] R. E. Chandler, R. Herman, E. W. Montroll, “Traffic dynamics: studies in car following”, Operations research, 6:2 (1958), 165–184 | DOI | MR

[15] M. Bando et al., “Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay”, Physical Review E, 58:5 (1998), 5429 | DOI | MR

[16] L. C. Davis, “Modifications of the optimal velocity traffic model to include delay due to driver reaction time”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 319 (2003), 557–567 | DOI | Zbl

[17] M. Treiber, A. Kesting, D. Helbing, “Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 360:1 (2006), 71–88 | DOI

[18] S. Bexelius, “An extended model for car-following”, Transportation Research, 2:1 (1968), 13–21 | DOI

[19] H. Lenz, C. K. Wagner, R. Sollacher, “Multi-anticipative car-following model”, The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 7:2 (1999), 331–335 | DOI

[20] T. Nagatani, “Stabilization and enhancement of traffic flow by the next-nearest-neighbor interaction”, Physical Review E, 60:6 (1999), 6395 | DOI

[21] S. P. Hoogendoorn, S. Ossen, M. Schreuder, “Empirics of multianticipative car-following behavior”, Transportation Research Record, 1965:1 (2006), 112–120 | DOI

[22] Z. Wen-Xing, J. Lei, “Analysis of a new car-following model with a consideration of multi-interaction of preceding vehicles”, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (2007), 320–324

[23] A. Tordeux, S. Lassarre, M. Roussignol, “An adaptive time gap car-following model”, Transportation research part B: methodological, 44:8–9 (2010), 1115–1131 | DOI

[24] Y. Hu, T. Ma, J. Chen, “An extended multi-anticipative delay model of traffic flow”, Communications in nonlinear science and numerical simulation, 19:9 (2014), 3128–3135 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[25] A. Kesting, M. Treiber, D. Helbing, “General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models”, Transportation Research Record, 1999:1 (2007), 86–94 | DOI

[26] G. Orozs, R. E. Wilson, B. Krauskopf, “Global bifurcation investigation of an optimal velocity traffic model with driver reaction time”, Phys Rev E, 70 (2004), 026207 | DOI | MR

[27] M. Bando et al., “Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation”, Physical review E, 51:2 (1995), 1035 | DOI | MR

[28] V. V. Kurtc, I. E. Anufriev, “Car-following model with explicit reaction-time delay: linear stability analysis of a uniform solution on a ring”, Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 9:6 (2017), 679–687 | DOI | MR

[29] A. Tordeux, M. Chraibi, A. Seyfried, “Influence of the interaction range on the stability of following models”, Proc. of the Eighth Int. Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation (2014), 10 pp.

[30] M. Lakshmanan, D. V. Senthilkumar, Dynamics of nonlinear time-delay systems, Springer Science Business Media, 2011 | MR

[31] D. O. Trufanov, Mikroskopicheskie modeli avtomobilnogo trafika s neskolkimi liderami, VKR magistra: 01.04.02 — Prikladnaya matematika i informatika, Sankt-Peterburg, 2018

[32] M. Kikuchi et al., “Long-term traffic data from Japanese expressway”, traffic and granular Flow'01, eds. M. Fukui et al., 2003, 257–262 | DOI