Geodesic
To justification of the integral convergence method for studying the finite-difference schemes accuracy
Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 33 (2021) no. 4, pp. 45-59.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

We justified the method of integral convergence for studying the accuracy of finitedifference shock-capturing schemes for numerical simulation of shock waves propagating at a variable speed. The order of integral convergence is determined using a series of numerical calculations on a family of embedded difference grids. It allows us to model a space-continuous difference solution of the corresponding Cauchy problem. This approach is used to study the accuracy of explicit finite-difference schemes such as Rusanov scheme, TVD and WENO schemes, which have a higher order of classic approximation, as well as an implicit compact scheme with artificial viscosity of the fourth order of divergence, which has a third order of both classic and weak approximation.
Keywords: intergal convergence of difference schemes, Rusanov scheme, TVD scheme, WENO scheme, compact scheme. 
@article{MM_2021_33_4_a2,
     author = {V. V. Ostapenko and N. A. Khandeeva},
     title = {To justification of the integral convergence method for studying the finite-difference schemes accuracy},
     journal = {Matemati\v{c}eskoe modelirovanie},
     pages = {45--59},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {33},
     number = {4},
     year = {2021},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_4_a2/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. V. Ostapenko
AU  - N. A. Khandeeva
TI  - To justification of the integral convergence method for studying the finite-difference schemes accuracy
JO  - Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
PY  - 2021
SP  - 45
EP  - 59
VL  - 33
IS  - 4
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_4_a2/
LA  - ru
ID  - MM_2021_33_4_a2
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. V. Ostapenko
%A N. A. Khandeeva
%T To justification of the integral convergence method for studying the finite-difference schemes accuracy
%J Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
%D 2021
%P 45-59
%V 33
%N 4
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_4_a2/
%G ru
%F MM_2021_33_4_a2
V. V. Ostapenko; N. A. Khandeeva. To justification of the integral convergence method for studying the finite-difference schemes accuracy. Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 33 (2021) no. 4, pp. 45-59. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2021_33_4_a2/

[1] P. D. Lax, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves, Soc. Industr. and Appl. Math., Philadelphia, 1972 | MR

[2] B. Van Leer, “Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method”, J. Comp. Phys., 32:1 (1979), 101–136 | DOI | Zbl

[3] A. Harten, “High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws”, J. Comp. Phys., 49 (1983), 357–393 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[4] A. Harten, S. Osher, “Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes”, SIAM J. Numer. Analys., 24:2 (1987), 279–309 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] X. Liu, E., “Tadmor Third order nonoscillatory central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws”, Numer. Math., 79 (1998), 397–425 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[6] G. S. Jiang, C. W. Shu, “Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes”, J. Comp. Phys., 126 (1996), 202–228 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] B. Cockburn, “An Introduction to the Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Convection Dominated Problems”, Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1697, 1998, 151–268 | MR | Zbl

[8] S. A. Karabasov, V. M. Goloviznin, “Compact accurately boundary-adjusting high-resolution technique for fluid dynamics”, J. Comp. Phys., 228 (2009), 7426–7451 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[9] V. V. Ostapenko, “Convergence of finite-difference schemes behind a shock front”, Comp. Math. Math. Phys., 37:10 (1997), 1161–1172 | MR | Zbl

[10] J. Casper, M. H. Carpenter, “Computational consideration for the simulation of shock-induced sound”, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 19:1 (1998), 813–828 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[11] B. Engquist, B. Sjogreen, “The convergence rate of finite difference schemes in the presence of shocks”, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35 (1998), 2464–2485 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[12] O. A. Kovyrkina, V. V. Ostapenko, “On the convergence of shock-capturing difference schemes”, Dokl. Math., 82:1 (2010), 599–603 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] O. A. Kovyrkina, V. V. Ostapenko, “On the practical accuracy of shock-capturing schemes”, Math. Models Comp. Simul., 6:2 (2014), 183–191 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[14] N. A. Mikhailov, “The convergence order of WENO schemes behind a shock front”, Math. Models Comp. Simul., 7:5 (2015), 467–474 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[15] M. E. Ladonkina, O. A. Neklyudova, V. V. Ostapenko, V. F. Tishkin, “On the Accuracy of the Discontinuous Galerkin Method in Calculation of Shock Waves”, Comp. Math. Math. Phys., 58:8 (2018), 1344–1353 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[16] O. A. Kovyrkina, V. V. Ostapenko, “On monotonicity and accuracy of CABARET scheme calculating weak solutions with shocks”, Comp. Technologies, 23:2 (2018), 37–54

[17] V. V. Ostapenko, “The convergence on a shock wave of continuous calculation difference schemes which are invariant with respect to similarity transformations”, USSR Comp. Math. Math. Phys., 26:6 (1986), 39–50 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[18] A. A. Samarskii, A. V. Gulin, Chislennye metody, Nauka, M., 1989, 430 pp.

[19] A. K. Henrick, T. D. Aslam, J. M. Powers, “Simulation of pulsating one-dimensional detonations with true fifth order accuracy”, J. Comp. Phys., 213:1 (2006), 311–329 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[20] V. V. Rusanov, “Difference schemes of third order accuracy for the through calculation of discontinuous solutions”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 180:6 (1968), 1303–1305 | MR | Zbl

[21] V. V. Ostapenko, “Construction of high-order accurate shock-capturing finite-difference schemes for unsteady shock waves”, Comp. Math. Math. Phys., 40:12 (2000), 1784–1800 | MR | Zbl

[22] V. V. Ostapenko, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and its application to the theory of shallow water, Second edition, NSU, Novosibirsk, 2014, 234 pp.

[23] V. V. Ostapenko, “Equivalent definitions of conservative finite-difference schemes”, USSR Comp. Math. Math. Phys., 29:4 (1989), 100–110 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[24] V. V. Ostapenko, “On the strong monotonicity of nonlinear difference schemes”, Comp. Math. Math. Phys., 38:7 (1998), 1119–1133 | MR | Zbl