Geodesic
Grid-characteristic calculation of multistorey buildings destruction
Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 32 (2020) no. 3, pp. 102-114.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

Nowadays, many objects are subject to the risks of seismic activity, both during earthquakes, and due to man-made impacts. For example, the zone of increased seismic activity includes the eastern regions of Russia, located in the zone of the so-called Ring of Fire, the coastal zone of the continents of Eurasia, North America, South America and Australia, as well as the islands surrounding the Pacific Ocean. Given the development of high-performance computing systems, the study of the possibilities of using more precision methods for calculating the earthquake resistance of structures as a result of natural and man-made impacts is an actual fundamental scientific problem, which this work is devoted to. The grid-characteristic method was used for the calculation. The wave fields of the velocity vector and the Cauchy stress tensor were calculated using this method. Then, the fracture areas of multi-storey concrete buildings were calculated using the destruction criterion of main stress. Destroyed areas were subsequently considered as free boundaries within the integration domain. In this work various types of assignment of the initial seismic impact are considered. Their comparison is made on the impact on the localization of the fracture areas and the cost of computing resources. A comparison was also made of the localization of the calculated areas of destruction of multi-storey buildings with a decrease in the step of the computational grid in coordinates and the step of integration over time. The dependence of the localization of the calculated fracture areas is analyzed depending on the type of seismic impact assignment, type of seismic wave, number of floors in the building. The paper presents data on the consumption of computing resources for various problem statements: random access memory, hard disk memory, and computation time.
Keywords: supercomputer simulation, grid-characteristic method, earthquake resistance, high-rise buildings. 
@article{MM_2020_32_3_a5,
     author = {A. V. Favorskaya and I. B. Petrov},
     title = {Grid-characteristic calculation of multistorey buildings destruction},
     journal = {Matemati\v{c}eskoe modelirovanie},
     pages = {102--114},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {32},
     number = {3},
     year = {2020},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2020_32_3_a5/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. V. Favorskaya
AU  - I. B. Petrov
TI  - Grid-characteristic calculation of multistorey buildings destruction
JO  - Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
PY  - 2020
SP  - 102
EP  - 114
VL  - 32
IS  - 3
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2020_32_3_a5/
LA  - ru
ID  - MM_2020_32_3_a5
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. V. Favorskaya
%A I. B. Petrov
%T Grid-characteristic calculation of multistorey buildings destruction
%J Matematičeskoe modelirovanie
%D 2020
%P 102-114
%V 32
%N 3
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2020_32_3_a5/
%G ru
%F MM_2020_32_3_a5
A. V. Favorskaya; I. B. Petrov. Grid-characteristic calculation of multistorey buildings destruction. Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 32 (2020) no. 3, pp. 102-114. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MM_2020_32_3_a5/

[1] P. Moczo, J. O. Robertsson, L. Eisner, “The finite-difference time-domain method for modeling of seismic wave propagation”, Advances in geophysics, 48 (2007), 421–516 | DOI

[2] T. Wang, X. Tang, “Finite-difference modeling of elastic wave propagation: A nonsplitting perfectly matched layer approach”, Geophysics, 68:5 (2003), 1749–1755 | DOI

[3] R. W. Graves, “Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences”, Bull. of the Seismolog. Society of America, 86:4 (1996), 1091–1106 | MR

[4] M. Dumbser, M. Kaser, “An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes. I. The two-dimensional isotropic case with external source terms”, Geophysical Journal International, 166:6 (2006), 855–877

[5] M. Dumbser, M. Kaser, “An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes?II. The three-dimensional isotropic case”, Geophysical Journal International, 167:6 (2006), 319–336 | DOI

[6] E. Tessmer, “3-D Seismic modeling of general material anisotropy in the presence of the free surface by Chebyshev spectral method”, Geophysical J. International, 59 (1995), 464–473

[7] H. Igel, “Wave propagation in three-dimensional spherical sections by Chebyshev spectral method”, Geophysical Journal International, 136 (1999), 559–566 | DOI

[8] D. Komatitsch, J. P. Vilotte, R. Vai, J. M. Castillo-Covarrubias, F. J. Sanchez-Sesma, “The spectral element method for elastic wave equations-application to 2-D and 3-D seismic problems”, International Journal for numerical methods in engineering, 45:9 (1999), 1139–1164 | 3.0.CO;2-T class='badge bg-secondary rounded-pill ref-badge extid-badge'>DOI | Zbl

[9] G. Seriani, “3-D large-scale wave propagation modeling by a spectral-element method on a Cray T3E multiprocessor”, Comp. Methods in Applied Mech. and Eng., 164 (1998), 235–247 | DOI | Zbl

[10] A. V. Favorskaya, I. B. Petrov, “Grid-characteristic method”, Innovations in Wave Processes Modelling and Decision Making, Ch. 7, SIST Series, 90, Springer Switzerland, 2018, 117–160 | MR

[11] A. V. Favorskaya, M. S. Zhdanov, N. I. Khokhlov, I. B. Petrov, “Modeling the wave phenomena in acoustic and elastic media with sharp variations of physical properties using the grid-characteristic method”, Geophysical Prospecting, 66:8 (2018), 1485–1502 | DOI | MR

[12] V. A. Biryukov, V. A. Miryakha, I. B. Petrov, N. I. Khokhlov, “Simulation of elastic wave propagation in geological media: Intercomparison of three numerical methods”, Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 56:6 (2016), 1086–1095 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] M. L. Yaghin, M. A. Hesari, “Dynamic analysis of the arch concrete dam under earthquake force with ABAQUS”, Journal of Applied Sciences, 8:15 (2008), 2648–2658 | DOI

[14] Y. Xunqiang, L. Jianbo, W. Chenglin, L. Gao, “ANSYS implementation of damping solvent stepwise extraction method for nonlinear seismic analysis of large 3-D structures”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 44 (2013), 139–152 | DOI | MR

[15] Z. Nikolic, N. Zivaljic, H. Smoljanovic, I. Balic, “Numerical modelling of reinforced concrete structures under seismic loading based on the finite element method with discrete inter element cracks”, Earthquake Eng. Structural Dynamics, 46:1 (2017), 159–178 | DOI | MR

[16] A. Breus, A. Favorskaya, V. Golubev, A. Kozhemyachenko, I. Petrov, “Investigation of seismic stability of high-rising buildings using grid-characteristic method”, Proc. Computer Science, 154 (2019), 305–310 | DOI

[17] A. Favorskaya, V. Golubev, D. Grigorievyh, “Explanation the difference in destructed areas simulated using various failure criteria by the wave dynamics analysis”, Procedia Computer Science, 126 (2018), 1091–1099 | DOI

[18] A. V. Favorskaya, I. B. Petrov, “Study of seismic isolation by full-wave numerical modeling”, Doklady Earth Sciences, 481:5 (2018), 1070–1072 | DOI

[19] A. V. Favorskaya, A. V. Breus, B. V. Galitskii, “Application of the grid-characteristic method to the seismic isolation model”, Smart Innovation, Syst. Tech., 133 (2019), 167–181 | DOI

[20] A. S. Kholodov, Ya. A. Kholodov, “Monotonicity criteria for difference schemes designed for hyperbolic equations”, Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 46:9 (2006), 1560–1588 | DOI | MR