The mathematical models of R\ rivalry

A. I. Terekhov

Matematičeskoe modelirovanie, Tome 15 (2003) no. 4, pp. 34-64.

Résumé

The analysis and the survey of mathematical models of the R rivalry are presented. The main attention is paid to the rivalry in the races form, namely: the patent races at the inter-firm and the international inter-firm levels for commercial R the military technology races at the interstate level for military R The classification of the models under consideration is given; the real problems are studied with their help and the applied mathematical tools are characterized; obtained conclusions, their empirical validity and suitableness for decision making are discussed too.

Bibliographie

[1] Samarskii A. A., Mikhailov A. P., Matematicheskoe modelirovanie. Idei. Metody. Primery, Nauka, M., 1997

[2] Morishima M., Ravnovesie, ustoichivost, rost, Nauka, M., 1972

[3] Barzel Y., “Optimal timing of innovations”, Rev. Econom. and Statist., 50:3 (1968)

[4] Kamien M. I., Schwartz N. L., “Timing of innovations under rivalry”, Econometrica, 40:1 (1972) | DOI | Zbl

[5] Kamien M. I., Schwartz N. L., “On the degree of rivalry for maximum innovative activity”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90:2 (1976) | DOI | MR

[6] Dasgupta P., “The Theory of Technological Competition”, New Developments in Analysis of Market Structure, eds. Stiglitz J. E., Mathewson G. F., MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986, 519–547

[7] Loury G. C., “Market structure and innovation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93:3 (1979) | DOI | Zbl

[8] Lee T., Wilde L. L., “Market structure and innovation: a Reformulation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94:2 (1980) | DOI

[9] Nti K. O., “Comparative statics of contests and rent-seeking games”, International. Economic Review, 38:1 (1997) | DOI | Zbl

[10] Nti K. O., “Stability in the patent race contest of Lee and Wilde”, Economic Theory, 14:1 | Zbl

[11] Dixit A. K., “A General model of R and D competition and policy”, RAND Journal of Economics, 19:3 (1988) | DOI | MR

[12] Gilbert R. J., Newbery D. M., “Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly”, The American Economic Review, 72:3 (1982)

[13] Reinganum J. F., “Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly”, The American Economic Review, 73:4 (1983)

[14] Gilbert R. J., Newbery D. M., “Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly: Comment”, The American Economic Review, 74:1 (1984)

[15] Reinganum J. F., “Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly: Reply”, The American Economic Review, 74:1 (1984)

[16] Salant S. W., “Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly: Comment”, The American Economic Review, 74:1 (1984) | MR

[17] Gallini N. T., “Detterence by market sharing: a Strategic incentive for licensing”, The American Economic Review, 74:5 (1984)

[18] Eswaran M., “Licensees as entry barriers”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 27:3 (1994)

[19] Sang-Seung Yi., “Uncertain innovation and persistence of monopoly revisited”, Economics Letters, 49:3 (1995) | Zbl

[20] Reinganum J. F., “Innovation and industry evolution”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100:1 (1985) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[21] Rasmusen E., Games and Information. An Introduction to Game Theory, Basil Blackwell Ltd, NY, 1989 | MR

[22] Grossman G., “Shapiro C Dynamic R competition”, The Economic Journal, 97:399 (1987)

[23] Fudenberg D., Gilbert R. et al., “Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races”, European Economic Review, 22:1 (1983) | DOI

[24] Harris C., Vickers J., “Perfect equilibrium in a model of race”, The Review of Economic Studies, 52:169 (1985) | MR | Zbl

[25] Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F., “Dropout behavior in R races with learning”, RAND Journal of Economics, 18:2 (1987) | DOI | MR

[26] Choi J. P., “Dynamic R competition under “hazard rate” uncertainty”, RAND Journal of Economics, 22:4 (1991) | DOI | Zbl

[27] Bag P. K., Dasgupta S., “Strategic R success announcements”, Economics Letters, 47:1 (1995) | DOI

[28] Denicolo V., “Two-stage patent races and patent policy”, RAND Journal of Economics, 31:6 (2000)

[29] Ulph D., Owen R., “Racing in two dimensions”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4:3 (1994) | DOI | MR

[30] Spencer B. J., Brander J. A., “International R rivalry and industrial strategy”, The Review of Economic Studies, 50:163 (1983)

[31] Bagwell K., Staiger R. W., “The sensitivity of strategic and corrective R policy in battles for monopoly”, International Economic Review, 33:4 (1992) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[32] Bagwell K., Staiger R. B., “The sensitivity of strategic and corrective R policy in oligopolistic industries”, Journal of International Economics, 36:1–2 (1994)

[33] Terekhov A. I., “Matematicheskoe modelirovanie i analiz konkurentsii v sfere NIOKR”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika, 1999, no. 1

[34] Leahy D., Neary J. P., “R spillovers and the case for industrial policy in an open economy”, Oxford Economic Papers, 51:1 (1999) | DOI

[35] Miyagiva K., Ohno Y., “Strategic R policy and appropriability”, Journal of International Economics, 42:1–2 (1997)

[36] Jensen R., Thursby M., “Patent races, product standards, and international competition”, International Economic Review, 37:1 (1996) | DOI

[37] Caamu T. P., Matematicheskie modeli konfliktnykh situatsii, Sovetskoe radio, M., 1977

[38] Brams S. J., Superpower Games. Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict, Myrray Printing Co, Westford, Mass., 1985

[39] Koubi V., “Military technology races”, International Organization, 53:3 (1999) | DOI