Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
@article{MGTA_2022_14_2_a3, author = {Stepan Yu. Ponomarev and Alexandr B. Khutoretskii}, title = {Choice of mixed strategy in matrix game with nature by {Hurwitz} criterion}, journal = {Matemati\v{c}eska\^a teori\^a igr i e\"e prilo\v{z}eni\^a}, pages = {64--75}, publisher = {mathdoc}, volume = {14}, number = {2}, year = {2022}, language = {ru}, url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a3/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Stepan Yu. Ponomarev AU - Alexandr B. Khutoretskii TI - Choice of mixed strategy in matrix game with nature by Hurwitz criterion JO - Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ PY - 2022 SP - 64 EP - 75 VL - 14 IS - 2 PB - mathdoc UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a3/ LA - ru ID - MGTA_2022_14_2_a3 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Stepan Yu. Ponomarev %A Alexandr B. Khutoretskii %T Choice of mixed strategy in matrix game with nature by Hurwitz criterion %J Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ %D 2022 %P 64-75 %V 14 %N 2 %I mathdoc %U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a3/ %G ru %F MGTA_2022_14_2_a3
Stepan Yu. Ponomarev; Alexandr B. Khutoretskii. Choice of mixed strategy in matrix game with nature by Hurwitz criterion. Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ, Tome 14 (2022) no. 2, pp. 64-75. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a3/
[1] Aibazova S. Kh., “Optimizatsiya logisticheskikh izderzhek v biznese s ispolzovaniem sinteticheskogo kriteriya Gurvitsa dlya smeshannykh strategii”, Ekonomicheskie nauki, 113 (2014), 130–136
[2] Vilenskii P. L., Livshits V. N., Smolyak S. A., Otsenka effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov: teoriya i praktika, Delo, M., 2008
[3] Kibalov E. B., Kin A. A., “Uchet faktora neopredelennosti pri otsenke effektivnosti krupnomasshtabnykh regionalno-transportnykh proektov”, Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya, 2014, no. 2(82), 81–94
[4] Labsker L. G., Teoriya kriteriev optimalnosti i ekonomicheskie resheniya, KNORUS, M., 2012
[5] Smolyak S. A., Otsenka effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov v usloviyakh riska i neopredelennosti (teoriya ozhidaemogo effekta), Nauka, M., 2002
[6] Gärdenfors P., “Manipulation of social choice functions”, Journal of Economic Theory, 13 (1976), 217–228 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[7] Groenewald M. E., Pretorius P. D., “Comparison of decision-making under uncertainty investment strategies with the money market”, Journal of Financial Studies and Research, 2011 (2011), 16 pp.
[8] Gaspars-Wieloch H., “On a decision rule for mixed strategy searching under uncertainty on the basis of the coefficient of optimism”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110:2 (2014), 223–931
[9] Jaffray J.-Y., Jeleva M., “Information processing under imprecise risk with the Hurwicz criterion”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, Action M Agency, Prague, 2007, 233–242
[10] Kannai Y., Peleg B., “A note on the extension of an order on set to the power set”, Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (1984), 172–175 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[11] Milnor J. W., “Games against Nature”, Decision Processes, Wiley, New York, 1954, 49–60 | MR
[12] Rzepecki L., Jaśkowski P., “Application of game theory against nature in supporting bid pricing in construction”, Symmetry, 13:1 (2021) | DOI
[13] Smirnova L. V., “Nash–Hurwitz equilibrium for non-cooperative games”, Game Theory and Application, v. 4, Nova Science Pub. Inc., UK, 1999, 130–141 | MR