Geodesic
Game-theoretic approach in law
Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ, Tome 14 (2022) no. 2, pp. 51-63.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The article is devoted to the study of the possible application of game theory for the purposes of lawmaking and law enforcement. The purpose of the study is to identify the conditions and limits of the application of the game theory to situations with legal content. It is proved that the legal behavior of the subject can be evaluated through the prism of the axiom of completeness, transitivity, continuity, substitution and independence, and the result can be used in determining the criterion of "rationality of behavior", when fixing the presence or absence of signs of unfair behavior, abuse of law. The author comes to the conclusion that the incompleteness of the legal theory of games, which is expressed in the limited situations to which it can be applied, does not detract from its significance as an analytical tool, the results of which should be interpreted taking into account other methods of analyzing legal matter and situations of legal content.
Keywords: game theory, law, economic analysis of law, mathematical expectation. 
@article{MGTA_2022_14_2_a2,
     author = {Elizaveta Y. Martyanova},
     title = {Game-theoretic approach in law},
     journal = {Matemati\v{c}eska\^a teori\^a igr i e\"e prilo\v{z}eni\^a},
     pages = {51--63},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {14},
     number = {2},
     year = {2022},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a2/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Elizaveta Y. Martyanova
TI  - Game-theoretic approach in law
JO  - Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ
PY  - 2022
SP  - 51
EP  - 63
VL  - 14
IS  - 2
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a2/
LA  - ru
ID  - MGTA_2022_14_2_a2
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Elizaveta Y. Martyanova
%T Game-theoretic approach in law
%J Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ
%D 2022
%P 51-63
%V 14
%N 2
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a2/
%G ru
%F MGTA_2022_14_2_a2
Elizaveta Y. Martyanova. Game-theoretic approach in law. Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ, Tome 14 (2022) no. 2, pp. 51-63. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2022_14_2_a2/

[1] Yu.Ya. Baskin, D.I. Feldman, Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: problemy metodologii: Ocherki metodov issledovaniya, Izdatelstvo «Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya», M., 1971

[2] Vorobeva I. B., “Ponyatie konfliktnoi situatsii v sledstvennoi praktike”, Aktualnye problemy otraslevykh yuridicheskikh nauk, Saratovskii yuridicheskii institut im. D.I. Kurskogo, Izdatelstvo Saratovskogo universiteta, Saratov, 1982, 179–182

[3] Yu.Ya. Baskin, D.I. Feldman, Problemy voiny i mira, Tsit. po Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: problemy metodologii: Ocherki metodov issledovaniya, Izdatelstvo «Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya», M., 1971

[4] Yu.Ya. Baskin, D.I. Feldman, “Metodologiya sovetskoi nauki mezhdunarodnogo prava”, Tsit. po Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: problemy metodologii: Ocherki metodov issledovaniya, Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 9, Izdatelstvo «Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya», M., 1969, 59–66 | MR

[5] Raikher V. K., Obschestvenno-istoricheskie tipy strakhovaniya, Akademiya nauk SSSR. Institut prava, Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR, M.–L., 1947

[6] Sklovskii K. I., “Primenenie prava i printsip dobrosovestnosti”, Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2018, no. 2, 94–118

[7] Yakovlev A. M., “O pravometrii v amerikanskoi sotsiologii prava”, Uchenye zapiski, 29, Ministerstvo yustitsii SSSR; Vsesoyuznyi nauchno-issledovatelskii institut sovetskogo zakonodatelstva, 1973, 118–133

[8] N.S. Polevoi, N.V. Vitruk, Osnovy primeneniya kibernetiki v pravovedenii, M., 1977

[9] O. Morgenshtern, Dzh. fon Neiman, Teoriya igr i ekonomicheskoe povedenie, M., 1970 | MR

[10] Brown J. P., “Toward an Economic Theory of Liability”, J. Legal Stud., 323 (1973) | Zbl

[11] Huizinga J., Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, Beacon Press, Boston, 1950

[12] Myerson R. B., Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press, 1991 | MR | Zbl

[13] Nash J. F., “Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games”, Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, 36:2 (1950), 48–49 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[14] Nash J. F., Non-Cooperative Games, Ph. D. Thesis, Princeton University, Mathematics Department, 1950 | MR | Zbl

[15] Ruiz J. F., “La teoria de juegos en las ciencias sociales”, Estudios Socioloigicos, XXII:3 (2004), 625–646

[16] Samuelson W., “A Game-Theoretic Approach to Legal Settlements”, Game Theory and Business Applications, 2014, 207–231 | DOI | MR

[17] Shubert G., “The Study of Judicial Decision-Making as an Aspect of Political Behavior”, American Political Science Review. 1958, Tsit. po O pravometrii v amerikanskoi sotsiologii prava, Uchenye zapiski, 29, Ministerstvo yustitsii SSSR; Vsesoyuznyi nauchno-issledovatelskii institut sovetskogo zakonodatelstva, 1973, 118–133

[18] Tirado A. M., Camilo Bedoya Chavarriaga J., “Analisis economico del derecho aplicado a la enseianza del Derecho: Una aproximacion al uso de la Teoria de Juegos”, Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 18:34 (2008), 13–32

[19] Tyagi K., “Chapter 4 Game Theory in Law and Economics”, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013

[20] Walker R., A Chronology of Game Theory, 2012

[21] “Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 No 51-FZ (red. ot 28.06.2021, s izm. ot 26.10.2021)”, Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF. 05.12.1994. No 32. st. 3301

[22] “Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast chetvertaya) ot 18.12.2006 No 230-FZ (red. ot 11.06.2021) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.08.2021)”, Parlamentskaya gazeta, 21.12.2006, no. 214–215

[23] “Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 No 195-FZ (red. ot 01.07.2021) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.10.2021)”, Rossiiskaya gazeta, 31.12.2001, no. 256

[24] “Zakon RF ot 21.02.1992 No 2395-1 (red. ot 11.06.2021) «O nedrakh»”, Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF. 06.03.1995. No 10, st. 823

[25] “Federalnyi zakon ot 26.10.2002 No 127-FZ (red. ot 02.07.2021) «O nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstve)» (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 18.10.2021)”, Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF. 28.10.2002. No 43, st. 4190

[26] Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 23.12.2010 No 63 (red. ot 30.07.2013) «O nekotorykh voprosakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem glavy III.1 Federalnogo zakona «O nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstve)», SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[27] Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23.04.2019 # 10 «O primenenii chasti chetvertoi Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii», SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[28] Opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii po ekonomicheskim sporam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.07.2016 No 305-KG16-4920 po delu No A40–63374/2015, SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[29] Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Tsentralnogo okruga ot 09.07.2019 No F10-1105/2017 po delu No A35-10181/2015, SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[30] Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Uralskogo okruga ot 14.10.2021 No F09-5393/21 po delu No A50-28409/2018, SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[31] Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 24.04.2013 No 09AP-4664/2013 po delu No A40-94793/12-93-935, SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[32] Postanovlenie Devyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 30.01.2018 No 09AP-50809/2017 po delu No A40-119120/14, SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[33] Postanovlenie Dvadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 26.11.2020 No 20AP-6306/2020 po delu No A09-1184/2018, SPS «KonsultantPlyus» | Zbl

[34] Reshenie Kirovskogo raionnogo suda g. Rostova-na-Donu ot 12 avgusta 2011 goda po delu No 12-475/2011