Geodesic
Discrete arbitration procedure with nonuniform distribution
Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ, Tome 1 (2009) no. 4, pp. 78-92.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

We consider a zero-sum game related with arbitration scheme. The arbitrator's offers are concentrated in three or four points with nonuniform distribution. The equilibrium in mixed strategies is derived.
Mots-clés : arbitration scheme
Keywords: discrete distribution, mixed strategies, equilibrium. 
@article{MGTA_2009_1_4_a4,
     author = {Alexsander Mentcher},
     title = {Discrete arbitration procedure with nonuniform distribution},
     journal = {Matemati\v{c}eska\^a teori\^a igr i e\"e prilo\v{z}eni\^a},
     pages = {78--92},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {1},
     number = {4},
     year = {2009},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2009_1_4_a4/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Alexsander Mentcher
TI  - Discrete arbitration procedure with nonuniform distribution
JO  - Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ
PY  - 2009
SP  - 78
EP  - 92
VL  - 1
IS  - 4
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2009_1_4_a4/
LA  - ru
ID  - MGTA_2009_1_4_a4
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Alexsander Mentcher
%T Discrete arbitration procedure with nonuniform distribution
%J Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ
%D 2009
%P 78-92
%V 1
%N 4
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2009_1_4_a4/
%G ru
%F MGTA_2009_1_4_a4
Alexsander Mentcher. Discrete arbitration procedure with nonuniform distribution. Matematičeskaâ teoriâ igr i eë priloženiâ, Tome 1 (2009) no. 4, pp. 78-92. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/MGTA_2009_1_4_a4/

[1] Farber H.S., “An analysis of final-offer arbitration”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24:4 (1980), 683–705 | DOI

[2] Mazalov V.V., Zabelin A.A., Karpin A.S., “Equilibrium in arbitration game”, Probabilistic Methods in Discrete Mathematics, 2002, 41–46

[3] Mazalov V.V., Mentcher A.E., Tokareva J.S., “On a discrete arbitration procedure in three points”, Game Theory and Applications, XI (2005), 87–91