Analysis of positional observations of Uranus, Neptune,
News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS, no. 6 (2010), pp. 20-27.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The analysis of series of astrometric observations of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto are fulfilled. On the result of this investigation, no valid evidence of existence of a massive planet behind Pluto was found.
Mots-clés : positional observations of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto
Keywords: Planet X.
@article{IZKAB_2010_6_a2,
     author = {A. V. Devyatkin},
     title = {Analysis of positional observations of {Uranus,} {Neptune,}},
     journal = {News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS},
     pages = {20--27},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     number = {6},
     year = {2010},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2010_6_a2/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. V. Devyatkin
TI  - Analysis of positional observations of Uranus, Neptune,
JO  - News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS
PY  - 2010
SP  - 20
EP  - 27
IS  - 6
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2010_6_a2/
LA  - ru
ID  - IZKAB_2010_6_a2
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. V. Devyatkin
%T Analysis of positional observations of Uranus, Neptune,
%J News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS
%D 2010
%P 20-27
%N 6
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2010_6_a2/
%G ru
%F IZKAB_2010_6_a2
A. V. Devyatkin. Analysis of positional observations of Uranus, Neptune,. News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS, no. 6 (2010), pp. 20-27. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2010_6_a2/

[1] E. S. Jackson, “Discussion of the observations of Neptune 1846-1970”, Astronomical papers, 22:2 (1974), 95–204, Washington

[2] Standish | Zbl

[3] A. Roi, Dvizhenie po orbitam, Mir, M., 1981, 465 pp.

[4] D. Jewitt, J. Luu, “Searchiny for Kuiper belt objects”, Astron. J., 109 (1995), 1867–1872 | DOI

[5] P. R. Weissman, “Dynamical evolution of the Oort cloud”, Dyn. comets origin and evol. proc., 1984, 11–15, Rome, June

[6] S. E. Hamid, Influence of a cometary belt on the motions of Uranus and Neptune, v. 299, Spec. Rept. Smithsonian Astrophys. Observ, 1969, 27 pp.

[7] M. L. Sveshnikov, “Ispolzovanie nablyudenii bolshikh planet dlya resheniya zadach efemeridnoi astronomii”, Byull. ITA, 15:7 (170) (1985), 375–382

[8] T. J. Deeming, “Fourier analysis with unequally-spaced data”, Astrophys. and Space Sci., 36 (1975), 137–158 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[9] V. V. Vityazev, E. Ya. Prudnikova, “Spektralnyi analiz neravnomerno raspredelennogo ryada nablyudenii”, V kn. «Izuchenie Zemli kak planety metodami geofiziki, geodezii i astronomii», Kiev, 1988, 226–229 pp.

[10] R. S. Gomes, S. Ferraz-Mello, “Planet X: A determination from the residuals in the ob served position of Uranus and Neptune”, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc., 20:3 (1988), 897

[11] A. Brunini, “Would a collision on Uranus explain its systematic residuals?”, Astron. Astrophys., 264 (1992), 292–295