Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
@article{IZKAB_2010_6_a2, author = {A. V. Devyatkin}, title = {Analysis of positional observations of {Uranus,} {Neptune,}}, journal = {News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS}, pages = {20--27}, publisher = {mathdoc}, number = {6}, year = {2010}, language = {ru}, url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2010_6_a2/} }
A. V. Devyatkin. Analysis of positional observations of Uranus, Neptune,. News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS, no. 6 (2010), pp. 20-27. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2010_6_a2/
[1] E. S. Jackson, “Discussion of the observations of Neptune 1846-1970”, Astronomical papers, 22:2 (1974), 95–204, Washington
[2] Standish | Zbl
[3] A. Roi, Dvizhenie po orbitam, Mir, M., 1981, 465 pp.
[4] D. Jewitt, J. Luu, “Searchiny for Kuiper belt objects”, Astron. J., 109 (1995), 1867–1872 | DOI
[5] P. R. Weissman, “Dynamical evolution of the Oort cloud”, Dyn. comets origin and evol. proc., 1984, 11–15, Rome, June
[6] S. E. Hamid, Influence of a cometary belt on the motions of Uranus and Neptune, v. 299, Spec. Rept. Smithsonian Astrophys. Observ, 1969, 27 pp.
[7] M. L. Sveshnikov, “Ispolzovanie nablyudenii bolshikh planet dlya resheniya zadach efemeridnoi astronomii”, Byull. ITA, 15:7 (170) (1985), 375–382
[8] T. J. Deeming, “Fourier analysis with unequally-spaced data”, Astrophys. and Space Sci., 36 (1975), 137–158 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[9] V. V. Vityazev, E. Ya. Prudnikova, “Spektralnyi analiz neravnomerno raspredelennogo ryada nablyudenii”, V kn. «Izuchenie Zemli kak planety metodami geofiziki, geodezii i astronomii», Kiev, 1988, 226–229 pp.
[10] R. S. Gomes, S. Ferraz-Mello, “Planet X: A determination from the residuals in the ob served position of Uranus and Neptune”, Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc., 20:3 (1988), 897
[11] A. Brunini, “Would a collision on Uranus explain its systematic residuals?”, Astron. Astrophys., 264 (1992), 292–295