Geodesic
Comparison of network systems analysis methods
News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS, no. 4 (2008), pp. 74-79.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

A comparison of two frequently used methods, namely, the Newton’s method and the Wood-Charles’ method is done. We show that the Wood-Charles’ method has no advantage compared to the Newton’s method. Both methods use linear approximation and iteration step in both of them differs quite insignificantly. We prove that in case of quadratic dependency of potential loss on flow size the methods are equivalent. Acceleration of Wood-Charles and Newton’s methods for network systems design is proposed and validated. 
@article{IZKAB_2008_4_a1,
     author = {V. Ch. Kudaev},
     title = {Comparison of network systems analysis methods},
     journal = {News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS},
     pages = {74--79},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     number = {4},
     year = {2008},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. Ch. Kudaev
TI  - Comparison of network systems analysis methods
JO  - News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS
PY  - 2008
SP  - 74
EP  - 79
IS  - 4
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/
LA  - ru
ID  - IZKAB_2008_4_a1
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. Ch. Kudaev
%T Comparison of network systems analysis methods
%J News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS
%D 2008
%P 74-79
%N 4
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/
%G ru
%F IZKAB_2008_4_a1
V. Ch. Kudaev. Comparison of network systems analysis methods. News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS, no. 4 (2008), pp. 74-79. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/

[1] D. Martin, G. Peters, “The Application of Newton's Method of Network Analysis by Digital Computer”, J. of the Inst. of Water Engineers, 17 (1963) | MR | Zbl

[2] V. Ya. Khasilev, K. S. Svetlov, M. K. Takaishvili, Metod konturnykh raskhodov dlya rascheta gidravlicheskikh tsepei, v. 339, Irkutsk, Moskva, 1968, 68 pp.

[3] R. Epp, A. Fowler, “Efficient Code for steady-state flows in networks”, Journal of the Hydraulic Division, ASCE, 96:HYI (1970)

[4] A. P. Merenkov, “Differentsiatsii metodov rascheta gidravlicheskikh tsepei”, ZhVM i MF, 1973, no. 5, 1237–1248

[5] Don J. Wood, A. Carl, “Charles Hydraulic Network Analysis Using Linear Teory”, Journal of the Hydraulic division, ASCE, 98:7 \date July (1972), 1157–1170 | DOI

[6] Metody rascheta vodoprovodnykh setei s prilozheniem EVM (obzor), Gosstroi SSSR. TsINI po stroitelstvu i arkhitekture, M., 1973, 30 pp.

[7] N. N. Abramov, Vodosnabzhenie, Stroiizdat, M., 1982

[8] SNiP 2. Vodosnabzhenie. Naruzhnye seti i sooruzheniya \date 04.02.84

[9] V. Ch. Kudaev, “Printsipy ekstremuma i ekstremalnyi metod analiza nelineinykh setevykh sistem”, Izvestiya vuzov. Povolzhskii region. Estestvennye nauki, 2005, no. 6 (21), 100–110