Geodesic
Comparison of network systems analysis methods
News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS, no. 4 (2008), pp. 74-79

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

A comparison of two frequently used methods, namely, the Newton’s method and the Wood-Charles’ method is done. We show that the Wood-Charles’ method has no advantage compared to the Newton’s method. Both methods use linear approximation and iteration step in both of them differs quite insignificantly. We prove that in case of quadratic dependency of potential loss on flow size the methods are equivalent. Acceleration of Wood-Charles and Newton’s methods for network systems design is proposed and validated. 
@article{IZKAB_2008_4_a1,
     author = {V. Ch. Kudaev},
     title = {Comparison of network systems analysis methods},
     journal = {News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS},
     pages = {74--79},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     number = {4},
     year = {2008},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. Ch. Kudaev
TI  - Comparison of network systems analysis methods
JO  - News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS
PY  - 2008
SP  - 74
EP  - 79
IS  - 4
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/
LA  - ru
ID  - IZKAB_2008_4_a1
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. Ch. Kudaev
%T Comparison of network systems analysis methods
%J News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS
%D 2008
%P 74-79
%N 4
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/
%G ru
%F IZKAB_2008_4_a1
V. Ch. Kudaev. Comparison of network systems analysis methods. News of the Kabardin-Balkar scientific center of RAS, no. 4 (2008), pp. 74-79. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IZKAB_2008_4_a1/