Optimal balance of individual and collective in honeybee foraging

V. Tereshko

Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, Tome 31 (2023) no. 4, pp. 439-451.

Résumé

Purpose. Previously, we developed a minimal foraging model in a honey bee colony that is applicable to describe both the decision-making process and the phase transition between two behavioral modes of the colony, individual and collective. In this paper, we show that this model is also applicable to determine the optimal division of labor in the colony, namely, to determine the optimal proportions between different types of foragers, scouts and recruits. Model. We represent the steps in the foraging process as reactions of chemical kinetics, which leads to reaction-diffusion equations. The reaction part describes the dynamic modes of the foraging process: the recruitment of unemployed foragers to profitable food sources, that have become unprofitable as a result of their exploitation, and scouting. Diffusion describes the transfer of information in a honey bee colony. We assume almost perfect accuracy in the transmission and use of information about food sources in the colony, which is modeled by a very small diffusion coefficient of working foragers in the information space. On the contrary, the diffusion coefficient of unemployed foragers is chosen large to ensure their full mixing in the information space. This models the equal accessibility to transmitted information for all unemployed foragers in the hive. Results. We consider the profit of a colony on an exploited food source as the number of foragers working on that source, weighted by its value to the colony. It was found that with an increase in the intensity of scouting, the profit of the colony first grows, and then begins to fall, thus illustrating that there is an optimal balance of scouts and recruits, which ensures the greatest influx of food resources into the colony. Conclusion. An optimal division of labor in a honey bee colony, defining a dynamic balance between exploration and exploitation in a constantly changing environment, is essential to the survival of the colony. Considering that scouts use exclusively personal information, and recruits take advantage of social information, we can say that our model describes the optimal balance between the individual and the collective in the colony.

Détail

Keywords: honey bee colony, foraging, scouting, recruitment to the source, individual behaviour, collective behaviour, colony profit, optimal ratio of foragers.

Bibliographie

[1] Biesmeijer J. C., de Vries H., “Exploration and exploitation of food sources by social insect colonies: a revision of the scout-recruit concept”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49:2–3 (2001), 89–99 | DOI

[2] Corbet S. A., Unwin D. M., Prŷs-Jones O. E., “Humidity, nectar and insect visits to flowers, with special reference to Crataegus, Tilia and Echium”, Ecol. Entomol, 4:1 (1979), 9–22 | DOI

[3] Moore D., Van Nest B. N., Seier E., “Diminishing returns: the influence of experience and environment on time-memory extinction in honey bee foragers”, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 197:6 (2011), 641–651 | DOI

[4] Dornhaus A., Chittka L., “Why do honey bees dance?”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55:4 (2004), 395–401 | DOI

[5] Seeley T. D., “Progress in understanding how the waggle dance improves the foraging efficiency of honey bee colonies”, Honeybee Neurobiology and Behavior, eds. Galizia C., Eisenhardt D., Giurfa M., Springer, Dordrecht, 2012, 77–87 | DOI

[6] Schürch R., Grüter C., “Dancing bees improve colony foraging success as long-term benefits outweigh short-term costs”, PLoS ONE, 9:8 (2014), e104660 | DOI

[7] Beekman M., Lew J. B., “Foraging in honeybees–when does it pay to dance?”, Behavioral Ecology, 19:2 (2008), 255–261 | DOI

[8] I’Anson Price R., Dulex N., Vial N., Vincent C., Grüter C., “Honeybees forage more successfully without the “dance language” in challenging environments”, Science Advances, 5:2 (2019), eaat0450 | DOI

[9] Sherman G., Visscher P. K., “Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing”, Nature, 419:6910 (2002), 920–922 | DOI

[10] Donaldson-Matasci M. C., Dornhaus A., “How habitat affects the benefits of communication in collectively foraging honey bees”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66:4 (2012), 583–592 | DOI

[11] Dornhaus A., Klügl F., Oechslein C., Puppe F., Chittka L., “Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model”, Behavioral Ecology, 17:3 (2006), 336–344 | DOI

[12] Dechaume-Moncharmont F.-X., Dornhaus A., Houston A. I., McNamara J. M., Collins E. J., Franks N. R., “The hidden cost of information in collective foraging”, Proc. R. Soc. B, 272:1573 (2005), 1689–1695 | DOI

[13] Dreller C., “Division of labor between scouts and recruits: genetic influence and mechanisms”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43:3 (1998), 191–196 | DOI

[14] Seeley T. D., “Division of labor between scouts and recruits in honeybee foraging”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12:3 (1983), 253–259 | DOI

[15] Calderone N. W., Page Jr. R. E., “Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae)”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22:1 (1988), 17–25 | DOI

[16] Calderone N. W., Page Jr. R. E., “Effects of interactions among genotypically diverse nestmates on task specialization by foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera)”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30:3–4 (1992), 219–226 | DOI

[17] Dreller C., Fondrk M. K., Page Jr. R. E., “Genetic variability affects the behavior of foragers in a feral honeybee colony”, Naturwissenschaften, 82:5 (1995), 243–245 | DOI

[18] Page Jr. R. E., Waddington K. D., Hunt G. J., Fondrk M. K., “Genetic determinants of honey bee foraging behaviour”, Animal Behaviour, 50:6 (1995), 1617–1625 | DOI

[19] Page Jr. R. E., Erber J., Fondrk M. K., “The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)”, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 182:4 (1998), 489–500 | DOI

[20] Seeley T. D., The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995, 318 pp.

[21] Theraulaz G., Bonabeau E., Denuebourg J.-N., “Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 265:1393 (1998), 327–332 | DOI

[22] Fewell J. H., Bertram S. M., “Division of labor in a dynamic environment: response by honeybees (Apis mellifera) to graded changes in colony pollen stores”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46:3 (1999), 171–179 | DOI

[23] Visscher P. K., Seeley T. D., “Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest”, Ecology, 63:6 (1982), 1790–1801 | DOI

[24] Jones J. C., Myerscough M. R., Graham S., Oldroyd B. P., “Honey bee nest thermoregulation: Diversity promotes stability”, Science, 305:5682 (2004), 402–404 | DOI

[25] Beekman M., Gilchrist A. L., Duncan M., Sumpter D. J. T., “What makes a honeybee scout?”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61:7 (2007), 985–995 | DOI

[26] Johnson L. K., Hubbell S. P., Feener Jr. D. H., “Defense of food supply by eusocial colonies”, American Zoologist, 27:2 (1987), 347–358 | DOI

[27] Jaffe K., Deneubourg J. L., “On foraging, recruitment systems and optimum number of scouts in eusocial colonies”, Insectes Sociaux, 39:2 (1992), 201–213 | DOI

[28] Anderson C., “The adaptive value of inactive foragers and the scout-recruit system in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies”, Behavioral Ecology, 12:1 (2001), 111–119 | DOI

[29] Tereshko V., “Reaction-diffusion model of a honeybee colony’s foraging behaviour”, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI, v. 1917, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000, 807–816 | DOI

[30] Tereshko V., Lee T., “How information-mapping patterns determine foraging behaviour of a honey bee colony”, Open Systems Information Dynamics, 9:2 (2002), 181–193 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[31] Tereshko V., Loengarov A., “Collective decision making in honey-bee foraging dynamics”, Computing and Information Systems, 9:3 (2005), 1

[32] Loengarov A., Tereshko V., “Phase transitions and bistability in honeybee foraging dynamics”, Artificial Life, 14:1 (2008), 111–120 | DOI | MR

[33] Tereshko V., “Kinetic phase transition in honeybee foraging dynamics: Synergy of individual and collective”, Advances in Complex Systems, 23:6 (2020), 2050019 | DOI | MR