Geodesic
Noise effects in the quantum search algorithm from the viewpoint of computational complexity
International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Tome 22 (2012) no. 2, pp. 493-499.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Library of Science

We analyse the resilience of the quantum search algorithm in the presence of quantum noise modelled as trace preserving completely positive maps. We study the influence of noise on the computational complexity of the quantum search algorithm. We show that it is only for small amounts of noise that the quantum search algorithm is still more efficient than any classical algorithm.
Keywords: quantum algorithms, quantum noise, algorithm complexity
Mots-clés : algorytm kwantowy, szum kwantowy, złożoność algorytmu 
@article{IJAMCS_2012_22_2_a19,
     author = {Gawron, P. and Klamka, J. and Winiarczyk, R.},
     title = {Noise effects in the quantum search algorithm from the viewpoint of computational complexity},
     journal = {International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science},
     pages = {493--499},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {22},
     number = {2},
     year = {2012},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IJAMCS_2012_22_2_a19/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gawron, P.
AU  - Klamka, J.
AU  - Winiarczyk, R.
TI  - Noise effects in the quantum search algorithm from the viewpoint of computational complexity
JO  - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
PY  - 2012
SP  - 493
EP  - 499
VL  - 22
IS  - 2
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IJAMCS_2012_22_2_a19/
LA  - en
ID  - IJAMCS_2012_22_2_a19
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Gawron, P.
%A Klamka, J.
%A Winiarczyk, R.
%T Noise effects in the quantum search algorithm from the viewpoint of computational complexity
%J International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
%D 2012
%P 493-499
%V 22
%N 2
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IJAMCS_2012_22_2_a19/
%G en
%F IJAMCS_2012_22_2_a19
Gawron, P.; Klamka, J.; Winiarczyk, R. Noise effects in the quantum search algorithm from the viewpoint of computational complexity. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Tome 22 (2012) no. 2, pp. 493-499. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IJAMCS_2012_22_2_a19/

[1] Azuma, H. (2005). Higher-order perturbation theory for decoherence in Grover's algorithm, Physical Review A 72(4): 42305.

[2] Barnes, J. P. and Warren, W. S. (1999). Decoherence and programmable quantum computation, Physical Review A 60(6): 4363-4374.

[3] Bengtsson, I. and Życzkowski, K. (2006). Geometry of Quantum States. An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[4] Bouwmeester, D., Ekert, A. and Zeilinger, A. (2000). The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computation, Physics and Astronomy Online Library, Springer, http://www.springer.com/physics/quantum+physics/book/978-3-540-66778-0.

[5] Bugajski, S. (2001). Quantum search, Archiwum Informatyki Teoretycznej i Stosowanej 13(2): 143-150.

[6] Gawron, P., Klamka, J., Miszczak, J. A. and Winiarczyk, R. (2010). Extending scientific computing system with structural quantum programming capabilities, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences 58(1): 77-88.

[7] Grover, L. (1996). A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computation, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 212-219.

[8] Grover, L. K. (1997). Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack, Physical Review Letters 79(2): 325.

[9] Grover, L. K. (1998). A framework for fast quantum mechanical algorithms, Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), Dallas, TX, USA, pp. 53-62.

[10] Konstadakis, C. and Ellinas, D. (2001). Noisy Grover's Searching Algorithm, OSA Technical Digest Series, Optical Society of America, Rochester/New York, NY.

[11] Long, G. L., Li, Y. S., Zhang, W. L. and Tu, C. C. (2000). Dominant gate imperfection in Grover's quantum search algorithm, Physical Review A 61(4): 42305.

[12] Nielsen, M. and Chuang, I. (1999). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[13] Pablo-Norman, B. and Ruiz-Altaba, M. (1999). Noise in Grover's quantum search algorithm, Physical Review A 61(1): 12301.

[14] Salas, P. J. (2008). Noise effect on Grover algorithm, The European Physical Journal D 46(2): 365-373.

[15] Shapira, D., Mozes, S. and Biham, O. (2003). Effect of unitary noise on Grover's quantum search algorithm, Physical Review A 67(4): 42301.

[16] Shenvi, N., Brown, K. R. and Whaley, K. B. (2003). Effects of a random noisy oracle on search algorithm complexity, Physical Review A 68(5): 52313.

[17] Zhirov, O. V. and Shepelyansky, D. L. (2006). Dissipative decoherence in the Grover algorithm, The European Physical Journal D 38(2): 405-408.