An example of two cardinals that are equivalent in the $n$-order logic and not equivalent in the $(n+1)$-order logic
Fundamentalʹnaâ i prikladnaâ matematika, Tome 18 (2013) no. 1, pp. 35-44
Citer cet article
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
It is proved that the property of two models to be equivalent in the $n$th order logic is definable in the $(n+1)$th order logic. Basing on this fact, there is given an (nonconstructive) “example” of two $n$-order equivalent cardinal numbers that are not $(n+1)$-order equivalent.
[1] Brudno A. L., Teoriya funktsii deistvitelnogo peremennogo, Nauka, M., 1971 | MR | Zbl
[2] Bunina E. I., Mikhalëv A. V., “Elementarnaya ekvivalentnost kolets endomorfizmov abelevykh $p$-grupp”, Fundament. i prikl. mat., 10:2 (2004), 135–224 | MR | Zbl
[3] Keisler G., Chen Ch. Ch., Teoriya modelei, Mir, M., 1977 | MR
[4] Pinus A. G., “Svoistvo Lëvengeima–Skulema dlya logiki vtorogo poryadka”, Rekursivnye funktsii, Ivanovsk. gos. univ., Ivanovo, 1978, 55–60 | MR
[5] Poizat B., A Course in Model Theory: An Introduction to Contemporary Mathematical Logic, Springer, Berlin, 2000 | MR