Geodesic
A regression testing with semi-automatic test selection for auditing of IMS database
Čelâbinskij fiziko-matematičeskij žurnal, Tome 4 (2019) no. 2, pp. 241-249.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

This work aims to develop a regression testing framework with a semi-automatic test selection. As opposed to previous works it offers a manual combined approach to the development of regression testing with a semi-automatic test selection with according to various important factors such as the execution time, the required number of the test executions, the manual priority of the tests, a result of the previous tests, functionalities of the tests. It allows a more detailed manual configuration of the regression test sequence.
Keywords: software testing, regression testing, debugging, keyword driven testing, data driven testing, IMS database, test selection. 
@article{CHFMJ_2019_4_2_a9,
     author = {A. N. Ruchay},
     title = {A regression testing with semi-automatic test selection for auditing of {IMS} database},
     journal = {\v{C}el\^abinskij fiziko-matemati\v{c}eskij \v{z}urnal},
     pages = {241--249},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {4},
     number = {2},
     year = {2019},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CHFMJ_2019_4_2_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. N. Ruchay
TI  - A regression testing with semi-automatic test selection for auditing of IMS database
JO  - Čelâbinskij fiziko-matematičeskij žurnal
PY  - 2019
SP  - 241
EP  - 249
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CHFMJ_2019_4_2_a9/
LA  - en
ID  - CHFMJ_2019_4_2_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A A. N. Ruchay
%T A regression testing with semi-automatic test selection for auditing of IMS database
%J Čelâbinskij fiziko-matematičeskij žurnal
%D 2019
%P 241-249
%V 4
%N 2
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CHFMJ_2019_4_2_a9/
%G en
%F CHFMJ_2019_4_2_a9
A. N. Ruchay. A regression testing with semi-automatic test selection for auditing of IMS database. Čelâbinskij fiziko-matematičeskij žurnal, Tome 4 (2019) no. 2, pp. 241-249. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CHFMJ_2019_4_2_a9/

[1] Tulpule N., “Strategies for testing client-server interactions in mobile applications: How to move fast and not break things”, Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Mobile Development Lifecycle, 2013, 19–20

[2] Jensen C.S., Moller A., Su Z., “Server interface descriptions for automated testing of javascript web applications”, Proceedings of the 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, 2013, 510–520

[3] Legunsen O., Hariri F., Shi A., Lu Y., Zhang L., Marinov D., “An extensive study of static regression test selection in modern software evolution”, Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, 2016, 583–594

[4] Rothermel G., Harrold M.J., “A safe, efficient regression test selection technique”, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6:2 (1997), 173–210 | DOI

[5] Gligoric M., Eloussi L., Marinov D., “Practical regression test selection with dynamic file dependencies”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, 2015, 211–222

[6] Zhong H., Zhang L., Mei H., “An experimental study of four typical test suite reduction techniques”, Information and Software Technology, 50:6 (2008), 534–546 | DOI

[7] Shi A., Yung T., Gyori A., Marinov D., “Comparing and combining test-suite reduction and regression test selection”, Proceedings of the 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, 2015, 237–247

[8] Hao D., Zhang L., Zhang L., Rothermel G., Mei H., “A unified test case prioritization approach”, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 24:2 (2014), 10–31 | DOI

[9] Zhai K., Jiang B., Chan W.K., “Prioritizing test cases for regression testing of location-based services: Metrics, techniques, and case study”, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 7:1 (2014), 54–67 | DOI

[10] Yoo S., Harman M., “Regression testing minimization, selection and prioritization: A survey”, Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 22:2 (2012), 67–120 | DOI

[11] Burleson D.K., Inside the Database Object Model, 1st, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1998, 240 pp. | Zbl

[12] Long R., Harrington M., Hain R., Nicholls G., IMS Primer, IBM Redbooks, 2000

[13] Klein B., Long R.A., Blackman K.R., Goff D.L., Nathan S.P., Lanyi M.M., Wilson M.M., Butterweck J., Sherrill S.L., An Introduction to IMS: Your Complete Guide to IBM Information Management System, 2nd, IBM Press, 2012

[14] Rashmi, Bajpai N., “A keyword driven framework for testing web applications”, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3:3 (2012), 8–14 | MR

[15] Abhishek K., Kumar P., Sharad T., “Automation of Regression Analysis: Methodology and Approach”, Advances in Computer Science, Engeineering Applications, eds. D.C. Wyld et al., Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 481–487 | DOI

[16] Kumar P., Kavita D., “Automation framework for database testing”, 5th International Conference on Recent Innovations in Science, Engineering and Management, 2016, 88–93 | Zbl

[17] Laukkanen P., Data-driven and keyword-driven test automation frameworks, Master's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 2006, 98 pp.

[18] Artzi S., Dolby J., Jensen S.H., Moller A., Tip F., “A framework for automated testing of javascript web applications”, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, 2011, 571–580

[19] Sabev P., Grigorova K., “Manual to automated testing: An effort-based approach for determining the priority of software test automation”, International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 9:12 (2015), 2456–2462

[20] Gojare S., Joshi R., Gaigaware D., “Analysis and design of selenium webdriver automation testing framework”, Procedia Computer Science, 50 (2015), 341–346 | DOI

[21] Jyoti K.S., “A comparative study of five regression testing techniques: A survey”, International Journal of Scientific Technology Research, 3:8 (2014), 76–80