Analysing the Folk Theorem for Linked Repeated Games
Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 6 (2013), pp. 146-164.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

We deal with the linkage of infinitely repeated games. Results are obtained by analysing the relations between the feasible individually rational payoff regions of the isolated games and the linked game. In fact we have to handle geometric problems related to Minkowski sums, intersections and Pareto boundaries of convex sets.
Keywords: asymmetries, convex set, feasible individually rational payoff region, Folk theorem, full cooperation, linking, Minkowski sum, Pareto boundary, tensor game.
@article{CGTM_2013_6_a9,
     author = {Henk Folmer and Pierre von Mouche},
     title = {Analysing the {Folk} {Theorem} for {Linked} {Repeated} {Games}},
     journal = {Contributions to game theory and management},
     pages = {146--164},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {6},
     year = {2013},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Henk Folmer
AU  - Pierre von Mouche
TI  - Analysing the Folk Theorem for Linked Repeated Games
JO  - Contributions to game theory and management
PY  - 2013
SP  - 146
EP  - 164
VL  - 6
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a9/
LA  - en
ID  - CGTM_2013_6_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Henk Folmer
%A Pierre von Mouche
%T Analysing the Folk Theorem for Linked Repeated Games
%J Contributions to game theory and management
%D 2013
%P 146-164
%V 6
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a9/
%G en
%F CGTM_2013_6_a9
Henk Folmer; Pierre von Mouche. Analysing the Folk Theorem for Linked Repeated Games. Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 6 (2013), pp. 146-164. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a9/

[1] Benoît J., Krishna V., The {F}olk theorems for repeated games: A synthesis, Technical report, New York University; Penn State University, 1996

[2] Bernheim B., Whinston M., “Multimarket contact and collusive behavior”, Rand Journal of Economics, 21:1 (1990), 1–26 | DOI

[3] Botteon M., Carraro C., “Strategies for environmental negotiations: Issue linkage with heterogeneous countries”, Game Theory and the Environment, eds. N. Hanley, H. Folmer, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1998

[4] Carraro C., Siniscalco D., “International environmental agreements: Incentives and political economy”, European Economic Review, 42:3–5 (1999), 561–572

[5] Finus M., Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2001

[6] Folmer H., von Mouche P. H. M., “Interconnected games and international environmental problems, II”, Annals of Operations Research, 54 (1994), 97–117 | DOI | Zbl

[7] Folmer H., von Mouche P. H. M., “Transboundary pollution and international cooperation”, The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2000/2001, eds. T. Tietenberg, H. Folmer, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2000, 231–266

[8] Folmer H., von Mouche P. H. M., Linking of repeated games. {W}hen does it lead to more cooperation and pareto imporvements, Technical Report Nota Di Lavoro 60.2007, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milano, 2007

[9] Folmer H., von Mouche P. H. M., Ragland S., “Interconnected games and international environmental problems”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 3 (1993), 313–335 | DOI

[10] Just R., Netanyahu S., “The importance of structure in linking games”, Agricultural Economics, 24 (2000), 87–100 | DOI | MR

[11] Ragland S., International Environmental Externalities and Interconnected Games, PhD thesis, University of Colorado, 1995

[12] Spagnolo G., “On interdependent supergames: Multimarket contact, concavity and collusion”, Journal of Economic Theory, 89:1 (1999), 127–139 | DOI | MR | Zbl