Geodesic
Differential Bargaining Games as Microfoundations for Production Function
Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 6 (2013), pp. 289-300

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

In the present paper the game theory is applied to an important open question in economics: providing microfoundations for often-used types of production function. Simple differential games of bargaining are proposed to model a behavior of workers and capital-owners in processes of formation of possible factor prices and participants' weights (moral-ethical assessments). These games result, correspondingly, in a factor price curve and a weight curve — structures dual to a production function. Ultimately, under constant bargaining powers of the participants, the Cobb–Douglas form of the production function is received.
Keywords: bargaining, differential games, production factors, choice of technology, duality, production function. 
@article{CGTM_2013_6_a21,
     author = {Vladimir Matveenko},
     title = {Differential {Bargaining} {Games} as {Microfoundations} for {Production} {Function}},
     journal = {Contributions to game theory and management},
     pages = {289--300},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {6},
     year = {2013},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a21/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vladimir Matveenko
TI  - Differential Bargaining Games as Microfoundations for Production Function
JO  - Contributions to game theory and management
PY  - 2013
SP  - 289
EP  - 300
VL  - 6
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a21/
LA  - en
ID  - CGTM_2013_6_a21
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Vladimir Matveenko
%T Differential Bargaining Games as Microfoundations for Production Function
%J Contributions to game theory and management
%D 2013
%P 289-300
%V 6
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a21/
%G en
%F CGTM_2013_6_a21
Vladimir Matveenko. Differential Bargaining Games as Microfoundations for Production Function. Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 6 (2013), pp. 289-300. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a21/