Network Game of Pollution Cost Reduction
Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 6 (2013), pp. 24-34.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

In this paper a $n$-person network game theoretical model of emission reduction is considered. Each player has its own evolution of the stock of accumulated pollution. Dynamics of player $i$, $i=1\dots ,n$ depends on emissions of players $k\in K_i$, where $K_i$ is the set of players which are connected by arcs with player $i$. Nash Equilibrium is constructed. The cooperative game is considered. As optimal imputation the ES-value is supposed. The restriction on network structure to realization the irrational behavior proof condition is deduced.
Keywords: network game, Nash equilibrium, ES-value, imputation destribution procedure, irrational behavior proof condition.
@article{CGTM_2013_6_a2,
     author = {Anna Belitskaia},
     title = {Network {Game} of {Pollution} {Cost} {Reduction}},
     journal = {Contributions to game theory and management},
     pages = {24--34},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {6},
     year = {2013},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a2/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Anna Belitskaia
TI  - Network Game of Pollution Cost Reduction
JO  - Contributions to game theory and management
PY  - 2013
SP  - 24
EP  - 34
VL  - 6
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a2/
LA  - en
ID  - CGTM_2013_6_a2
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Anna Belitskaia
%T Network Game of Pollution Cost Reduction
%J Contributions to game theory and management
%D 2013
%P 24-34
%V 6
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a2/
%G en
%F CGTM_2013_6_a2
Anna Belitskaia. Network Game of Pollution Cost Reduction. Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 6 (2013), pp. 24-34. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2013_6_a2/

[1] Driessen T. S. H., Funaki Y., “Coincidence of and collinearity between game theoretic solutions”, OR Spektrum, 13 (1991), 15–30 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] Dockner E. J., Jorgensen S., van Long N., Sorger G., Differential Games in Economics and Management Science, Cambridge University Press, 2000, 41–85 | MR

[3] Haurie A., Zaccour G., “Differential game models of global environment management”, Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, 2 (1995), 3–24 | MR

[4] Iljina A., Kozlovskaya N., “D. W. K. Yeung's Condition for the coalitional solution of the game of pollution cost reduction”, Contributions to game theory and management, 3, 2010, 171–181 | MR

[5] Kaitala V., Pohjola M., “Sustainable international agreements on green house warming: a game theory study”, Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, 2 (1995), 67–88 | MR

[6] Owen G., “Values of games with a priory unions”, Mathematical Economy and Game Theory, eds. R. Henn, O. Moeschlin, Berlin, 1997, 78–88

[7] Petrosjan L., Differential Games of Pursuit, World Sci. Pbl., 1993, 320 pp. | MR

[8] Petrosjan L. A., “Cooperative differential games on networks”, Trudy Inst. Mat. i Mekh. UrO RAN, 16, no. 5, 2010, 143–150

[9] Petrosjan L., Zaccour G., “Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27 (2003), 381–398 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[10] Yeung D. W. K., “An irrational-behavior-proofness condition in cooperative differential games”, Intern. J. of Game Theory Rew., 8 (2006), 739–744 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[11] Yeung D. W. K., Petrosjan L. A., Cooperative Stochastic Differential Games, Springer Science; Business Media, 2006 | MR