Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
@article{CGTM_2012_5_a20, author = {Natalia I. Naumova}, title = {Generalized {Proportional} {Solutions} to {Games} with {Restricted} {Cooperation}}, journal = {Contributions to game theory and management}, pages = {230--242}, publisher = {mathdoc}, volume = {5}, year = {2012}, language = {en}, url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2012_5_a20/} }
Natalia I. Naumova. Generalized Proportional Solutions to Games with Restricted Cooperation. Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 5 (2012), pp. 230-242. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2012_5_a20/
[1] Soviet Math. Dokl., 30, 583–587 | MR
[2] Bregman L. M., Naumova N. I., “Goal programming solutions generated by utility functions”, Lecture Notes in Economic and Math. Systems, 510, 2002, 495–514 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[3] Bregman L. M., Romanovskij J. V., “Allotment and optimization in allocation problems”, Operations Research and Statistical Modeling, 3, ed. J. V. Romanovskij, Izdat. Leningrad. Univ., Leningrad, 1975, 137–162 (in Russian) | MR
[4] Moulin H., “Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing”, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Chapter 6, v. 1, eds. K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen, K. Suzumura, 2002, 289–357 | DOI
[5] Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. Math., 11 (1983), 67–73 | MR | Zbl | Zbl
[6] Naumova N. I., “Associated consistency based on utility functions of coalitions”, Game Theory and Applications, 13, Nova Publishers, New York, 2008, 115–125 | MR
[7] Naumova N., “Claim problems with coalition demands”, The Fourth International Conference Game Theory and Management, Collected Papers (June 28–30, 2010, St. Petersburg, Russia), Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 4, Graduate School of Management St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, 2011, 311–326 | MR | Zbl
[8] Thomson W., “Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey”, Mathematical Social Sciences, 45 (2003), 249–297 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[9] Yanovskaya E., “Consistency for proportional solutions”, International Game Theory Review, 4 (2002), 343–356 | DOI | MR | Zbl