Geodesic
Quality Competition: Uniform vs. Non-uniform Consumer Distribution
Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 2 (2009), pp. 111-123 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

A two-stage game-theoretical model of duopoly and vertical product differentiation is examined. It is assumed, that there are two firms on some industrial market which produce homogeneous product differentiated by quality. The results of the research of a two-stage model of duopoly are presented. At the first stage of the model companies define quality level and at the second stage they compete in product price. It is supposed that consumers are uniformly distributed. This model was extended to the case when consumers are distributed non-uniformly. The research presents the comparative analysis of results in the case of uniform and non-uniform consumers' distribution.
Keywords: vertical product differentiation, duopoly, multi-stage game, non-uniform consumer distribution, sub-game perfect equilibrium. 
@article{CGTM_2009_2_a9,
     author = {Margarita A. Gladkova and Nikolay A. Zenkevich},
     title = {Quality {Competition:} {Uniform} vs. {Non-uniform} {Consumer} {Distribution}},
     journal = {Contributions to game theory and management},
     pages = {111--123},
     year = {2009},
     volume = {2},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2009_2_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Margarita A. Gladkova
AU  - Nikolay A. Zenkevich
TI  - Quality Competition: Uniform vs. Non-uniform Consumer Distribution
JO  - Contributions to game theory and management
PY  - 2009
SP  - 111
EP  - 123
VL  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2009_2_a9/
LA  - en
ID  - CGTM_2009_2_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Margarita A. Gladkova
%A Nikolay A. Zenkevich
%T Quality Competition: Uniform vs. Non-uniform Consumer Distribution
%J Contributions to game theory and management
%D 2009
%P 111-123
%V 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2009_2_a9/
%G en
%F CGTM_2009_2_a9
Margarita A. Gladkova; Nikolay A. Zenkevich. Quality Competition: Uniform vs. Non-uniform Consumer Distribution. Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 2 (2009), pp. 111-123. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2009_2_a9/

[1] Amacher G. S., Kokela Erkki, Ollikainen Markku, “Quality competition and social welfare in markets with partial coverage: new results”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 57:4 (2005), 391–405 | DOI | MR

[2] Aoki Reiko, Pursa T. J., “Sequential versus simultaneous choice with endogenous quality”, Intenational Journal of Industrial Organization, 15 (1996), 103–121 | DOI

[3] Benassi Corrado, Chirco Alessandra, Colombo Caterina, “Vertical differentiation and distribution of income”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 58:4 (2006), 345–367 | MR

[4] Choi Chong Ju, Shin Hyun Song, “A comment on a model of vertical product differentiation”, The journal of industrial economics, XL:2 (1992), 229–231 | DOI

[5] Motta Massimo, “Endogenous quality choice: price vs. Quantity competition”, The journal of industrial economics, XLI:2 (1993), 113–131 | DOI

[6] Tanaka Yasuhito, “Profitability of price and quantity strategies in a duopoly with vertical product differentiation”, Economic Theory, 17 (2001), 693–700 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] Tirol Jean, The theory of industrial organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1988

[8] Wauthy Xavier, “Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation”, The journal of industrial economics, XLIV:3 (1996), 345–353 | DOI