How to Play Macroscopic Quantum Game

Andrei A. Grib ; Georgy N. Parfionov

Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 2 (2009), pp. 137-146.

Résumé

Quantum games are usually considered as games with strategies defined not by the standard Kolmogorovian probabilistic measure but by the probability amplitude used in quantum physics. The reason for the use of the probability amplitude or "quantum probabilistic measure" is the nondistributive lattice occurring in physical situations with quantum microparticles. In our paper we give examples of getting nondistributive orthomodular lattices in some special macroscopic situations without use of quantum microparticles. Mathematical structure of these examples is the same as that for the spin one half quantum microparticle with two non-commuting observables being measured. So we consider the so called Stern-Gerlach quantum games. In quantum physics it corresponds to the situation when two partners called Alice and Bob do experiments with two beams of particles independently measuring the spin projections of particles on two different directions In case of coincidences defined by the payoff matrix Bob pays Alice some sum of money. Alice and Bob can prepare particles in the beam in certain independent states defined by the probability amplitude so that probabilities of different outcomes are known. Nash equilibrium for such a game can be defined and it is called the quantum Nash equilibrium. The same lattice occurs in the example of the firefly flying in a box observed through two windows one at the bottom another at the right hand side of the box with a line in the middle of each window. This means that two such boxes with fireflies inside them imitate two beams in the Stern-Gerlach quantum game. However there is a difference due to the fact that in microscopic case Alice and Bob freely choose the representation of the lattice in terms of non-commuting projectors in some Hilbert space. In our macroscopic imitation there is a problem of the choice of this representation(of the angles between projections). The problem is solved by us for some special forms of the payoff matrix. We prove the theorem that quantum Nash equilibrium occurs only for the special representation of the lattice defined by the payoff matrix. This makes possible imitation of the microscopic quantum game in macroscopic situations. Other macroscopic situations based on the so called opportunistic behavior leading to the same lattice are considered.

Bibliographie

[1] Grib A., Khrennikov A., Parfionov G., Starkov K., “Quantum equilibria for macroscopic systems”, Journal of Physics A, 39 (2006), 8461–8475 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] Soros G., Alchemy of finances, Wiley Sohns, 2004

[3] Choustova O., “Quantum Bohmian model for financial market”, Journal of Physics A, 374 (2005), 016138 (Part 2) | MR

[4] Khrennikov A., “Quantum-like brain. Interference of mind”, Biosystems, 84 (2006), 225–241 | DOI

[5] Grib A., Rodrigues Jr. W. A., Nonlocality in Quantum Physics, Kluwer, Dodrecht; Plenum, New York, 1999

[6] Grib A., Khrennikov A., Parfionov G., Starkov K., “Probability amplitude in quantum like games”, Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations-3, Vaxjo University Press, 2004, 108–114 | MR

[7] Parfionov G. N., Multiple Nash-equilibrium in Quantum Game, 2008, arXiv: 0806.1102v1[quant-ph]

[8] Svozil K., Quantum Logic, Springer, Singapore, 1998 | MR

[9] Foulis D. J., A half century of quantum logic, What have we learned?, Einstein meets Magritte, 7, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999, 1–36 | MR

[10] Cohen D., An introduction to Hilbert space and quantum logic, Springer, New York, 1989 | MR

[11] Wright R., “Generalized urn models”, Found. Physics, 20 (1991), 881–903 | DOI | MR

[12] Birkhoff G., von Neumann J., “The logic of quantum mechanics”, Ann. Math., 37 (1936), 823–842 | DOI | MR

[13] Birchoff G., Lattice theory, AMS, Providence, Rhode Island, 1993

[14] Pykacz J., “Conjunctions, disjunctions and Bell-type inequalities on orthoalgebras”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35 (1996), 2355–2363 | DOI | MR

[15] Ochinnikov P. G., “Measures on finite concrete logics”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 127 (1999), 1957–1966 | DOI | MR

[16] Kochen S., Specker E. P., “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics”, J. of Rat. Mech. and Analysis, 17 (1967), 59–87 | MR | Zbl

[17] Bell J. S., Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 1988 | MR | Zbl

[18] Szabo L., Is there anything non-classical?, 1986, arXiv: quant-ph/9606006

[19] Zhou Y., Gall W., Nabb K., “Synchronizing fireflies”, College Math. J., 2006, 187–193 | DOI | MR