More non-bipartite forcing pairs
Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, Tome 88 (2019) no. 3, pp. 819-825
Tamás Hubai; Daniel Kráľ; Olaf Parczyk; Yury Person; Tamás Hubai; Daniel Kráľ; Olaf Parczyk; Yury Person. More non-bipartite forcing pairs. Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, Tome 88 (2019) no. 3, pp. 819-825. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2019_88_3_a71/
@article{AMUC_2019_88_3_a71,
     author = {Tam\'as Hubai and Daniel Kr\'a\v{l} and Olaf Parczyk and Yury Person and Tam\'as Hubai and Daniel Kr\'a\v{l} and Olaf Parczyk and Yury Person},
     title = { More non-bipartite forcing pairs},
     journal = {Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae},
     pages = {819--825},
     year = {2019},
     volume = {88},
     number = {3},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2019_88_3_a71/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Tamás Hubai
AU  - Daniel Kráľ
AU  - Olaf Parczyk
AU  - Yury Person
AU  - Tamás Hubai
AU  - Daniel Kráľ
AU  - Olaf Parczyk
AU  - Yury Person
TI  - More non-bipartite forcing pairs
JO  - Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae
PY  - 2019
SP  - 819
EP  - 825
VL  - 88
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2019_88_3_a71/
ID  - AMUC_2019_88_3_a71
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Tamás Hubai
%A Daniel Kráľ
%A Olaf Parczyk
%A Yury Person
%A Tamás Hubai
%A Daniel Kráľ
%A Olaf Parczyk
%A Yury Person
%T More non-bipartite forcing pairs
%J Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae
%D 2019
%P 819-825
%V 88
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2019_88_3_a71/
%F AMUC_2019_88_3_a71

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Comenius University

We study pairs of graphs $(H_1,H_2)$ such that every graph with the densities of $H_1$ and $H_2$ close to the densities of $H_1$ and $H_2$ in a random graph is quasirandom; such pairs $(H_1,H_2)$ are called forcing. Non-bipartite forcing pairs were first discovered by Conlon, H\`an, Person and Schacht~[{\em Weak quasi-randomness for uniform hypergraphs}, Random Structures Algorithms \textbf{40} (2012), no.~1, 1--38]: they showed that $(K_t, F)$ is forcing where $F$ is the graph that arises from $K_t$ by iteratively doubling its vertices and edges in a prescribed way $t$ times. Reiher and Schacht~[{\em Forcing quasirandomness with triangles}, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma. Vol. 7, 2019] strengthened this result for $t=3$ by proving that two doublings suffice and asked for the minimum number of doublings needed for $t>3$. We show that $\lceil(t+1)/2\rceil$ doublings always suffice.