Maximum induced subgraphs of the binomial random graph
Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, Tome 88 (2019) no. 3, pp. 423-427
Citer cet article
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Comenius University
We prove that a.a.s. the maximum size of an induced tree in the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$ is concentrated in four consecutive points. We also consider the following problem. Given $e(k)$, what is the maximum $k$ such that $G(n,p)$ has an induced subgraph with $k$ vertices and $e(k)$ edges? For $e=o(\frac{k\ln k}{\ln\ln k})$, we prove that a.a.s. this maximum size is concentrated in two consecutive points. In contrast, for $e(k)=p{k\choose 2}+O(k)$, we prove that this size is not concentrated in any finite set. Moreover, we prove that for an $\omega_n\to\infty$, a.a.s.~the size of the concentration set is smaller than $\omega_n\sqrt{n/\ln n}$. Otherwise, for an arbitrary constant $C>0$, a.a.s.~it is bigger than $C\sqrt{n/\ln n}$.