Two Approaches to Solving $l_1$-Regularized Least Squares with Application to Truss Topology Design
Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, Tome 84 (2015) no. 2, pp. 297-308
Roman Kukumberg; Roman Kukumberg. Two Approaches to Solving $l_1$-Regularized Least Squares with Application to Truss Topology Design. Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, Tome 84 (2015) no. 2, pp. 297-308. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2015_84_2_a9/
@article{AMUC_2015_84_2_a9,
     author = {Roman Kukumberg and Roman Kukumberg},
     title = { Two {Approaches} to {Solving} $l_1${-Regularized} {Least} {Squares} with {Application} to {Truss} {Topology} {Design}},
     journal = {Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae},
     pages = {297--308},
     year = {2015},
     volume = {84},
     number = {2},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2015_84_2_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Roman Kukumberg
AU  - Roman Kukumberg
TI  - Two Approaches to Solving $l_1$-Regularized Least Squares with Application to Truss Topology Design
JO  - Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae
PY  - 2015
SP  - 297
EP  - 308
VL  - 84
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2015_84_2_a9/
ID  - AMUC_2015_84_2_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Roman Kukumberg
%A Roman Kukumberg
%T Two Approaches to Solving $l_1$-Regularized Least Squares with Application to Truss Topology Design
%J Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae
%D 2015
%P 297-308
%V 84
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_2015_84_2_a9/
%F AMUC_2015_84_2_a9

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Comenius University

Many real-world problems may lead to minimization of a non-differentiable convex function of large number of variables. In this paper, we study two different approaches for solving the so-called $l_1$-regularized least squares problem. We apply and compare two competing methods of convex optimization for solving this problem, namely the proximal gradient method and the interior-point method. We describe two specialized inexact interior point methods for solving the $l_1$-regularized least squares problem and compare them with three different versions of the proximal gradient method known from literature. We illustrate performance of these methods on a truss topology design problem with more than 35000 variables. Both methods are compared, analyzed and a discussion on the performance is provided.