Geodesic
RNP AND KMP ARE INCOMPARABLE PROPERTIES IN NONCOMPLETE SPACES
Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, Tome 65 (1996) no. 2 
G. Lopez. RNP AND KMP ARE INCOMPARABLE PROPERTIES IN NONCOMPLETE SPACES. Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, Tome 65 (1996) no. 2. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_1996_65_2_a1/
@article{AMUC_1996_65_2_a1,
     author = {G. Lopez},
     title = {RNP {AND} {KMP} {ARE} {INCOMPARABLE} {PROPERTIES} {IN} {NONCOMPLETE} {SPACES}},
     journal = {Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae},
     year = {1996},
     volume = {65},
     number = {2},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_1996_65_2_a1/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - G. Lopez
TI  - RNP AND KMP ARE INCOMPARABLE PROPERTIES IN NONCOMPLETE SPACES
JO  - Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae
PY  - 1996
VL  - 65
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_1996_65_2_a1/
ID  - AMUC_1996_65_2_a1
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A G. Lopez
%T RNP AND KMP ARE INCOMPARABLE PROPERTIES IN NONCOMPLETE SPACES
%J Acta mathematica Universitatis Comenianae
%D 1996
%V 65
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AMUC_1996_65_2_a1/
%F AMUC_1996_65_2_a1

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Comenius University

We exhibit an example in a noncomplete space of a closed, bounded and convex subset verifying KMP and failing RNP and, another such example verifying RNP and failing KMP.