On the Tate pairing associated to an isogeny between abelian varieties over pseudofinite field
Algebra and discrete mathematics, Tome 16 (2013) no. 1, pp. 103-106

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

In this note, we consider the Tate pairing associated to an isogeny between abelian varieties over pseudofinite field. P. Bruin [1] defined this pairing over finite field $k$: $\mathrm{ker}\,\hat{\phi}(k) \; \times \; \mathrm{coker}\,(\phi(k)) \longrightarrow k^*$, and proved its perfectness over finite field. We prove perfectness of the Tate pairing associated to an isogeny between abelian varieties over pseudofinite field, with help of the method, used by P. Bruin in the case of finite ground field [1].
Keywords: pseudofinite field, isogeny, Tate pairing associated to an isogeny.
@article{ADM_2013_16_1_a10,
     author = {V. Nesteruk},
     title = {On the {Tate} pairing associated to an isogeny between abelian varieties over pseudofinite field},
     journal = {Algebra and discrete mathematics},
     pages = {103--106},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {16},
     number = {1},
     year = {2013},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ADM_2013_16_1_a10/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - V. Nesteruk
TI  - On the Tate pairing associated to an isogeny between abelian varieties over pseudofinite field
JO  - Algebra and discrete mathematics
PY  - 2013
SP  - 103
EP  - 106
VL  - 16
IS  - 1
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ADM_2013_16_1_a10/
LA  - en
ID  - ADM_2013_16_1_a10
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A V. Nesteruk
%T On the Tate pairing associated to an isogeny between abelian varieties over pseudofinite field
%J Algebra and discrete mathematics
%D 2013
%P 103-106
%V 16
%N 1
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ADM_2013_16_1_a10/
%G en
%F ADM_2013_16_1_a10
V. Nesteruk. On the Tate pairing associated to an isogeny between abelian varieties over pseudofinite field. Algebra and discrete mathematics, Tome 16 (2013) no. 1, pp. 103-106. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/ADM_2013_16_1_a10/