A Sparse Stress Model
Journal of graph algorithms and applications,
Special issue on Selected papers from the Twenty-fourth International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization, GD 2016
, Tome 21 (2017) no. 5, pp. 791-821
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Journal of Graph Algorythms and Applications website
Force-directed layout methods are among the most common approaches for drawing general graphs. Among them, stress minimization produces layouts of comparatively high quality while also imposing comparatively high computational demands. We propose a speed-up method based on the aggregation of terms in the objective function. It is akin to aggregate repulsion from far-away nodes during spring embedding but transfers the idea from the layout space into a preprocessing phase. An initial experimental study informs a method to select representatives, and subsequent more extensive experiments indicate that our method yields better approximations of minimum-stress layouts in less time than related methods.
Keywords:
graph drawing, multidimensional scaling, stress minimization, sparsification
@article{JGAA_2017_21_5_a1,
author = {Mark Ortmann and Mirza Klimenta and Ulrik Brandes},
title = {A {Sparse} {Stress} {Model}},
journal = {Journal of graph algorithms and applications},
pages = {791--821},
year = {2017},
volume = {21},
number = {5},
doi = {10.7155/jgaa.00440},
language = {en},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.7155/jgaa.00440/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Mark Ortmann AU - Mirza Klimenta AU - Ulrik Brandes TI - A Sparse Stress Model JO - Journal of graph algorithms and applications PY - 2017 SP - 791 EP - 821 VL - 21 IS - 5 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.7155/jgaa.00440/ DO - 10.7155/jgaa.00440 LA - en ID - JGAA_2017_21_5_a1 ER -
Mark Ortmann; Mirza Klimenta; Ulrik Brandes. A Sparse Stress Model. Journal of graph algorithms and applications, Special issue on Selected papers from the Twenty-fourth International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization, GD 2016 , Tome 21 (2017) no. 5, pp. 791-821. doi: 10.7155/jgaa.00440
Cité par Sources :