Geodesic
Sparse recovery under weak moment assumptions
Journal of the European Mathematical Society, Tome 19 (2017) no. 3, pp. 881-904.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source EMS Press

We prove that iid random vectors that satisfy a rather weak moment assumption can be used as measurement vectors in Compressed Sensing, and the number of measurements required for exact reconstruction is the same as the best possible estimate – exhibited by a random Gaussian matrix. We also prove that this moment condition is necessary, up to a log log factor. In addition, we explore the Compatibility Condition and the Restricted Eigenvalue Condition in the noisy setup, as well as properties of neighbourly random polytopes.
DOI : 10.4171/jems/682
Classification : 62-XX, 60-XX
Keywords: Compressed sensing, empirical processes, statistics, high dimensions 
@article{JEMS_2017_19_3_a5,
     author = {Guillaume Lecu\'e and Shahar Mendelson},
     title = {Sparse recovery under weak moment assumptions},
     journal = {Journal of the European Mathematical Society},
     pages = {881--904},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {19},
     number = {3},
     year = {2017},
     doi = {10.4171/jems/682},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4171/jems/682/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Guillaume Lecué
AU  - Shahar Mendelson
TI  - Sparse recovery under weak moment assumptions
JO  - Journal of the European Mathematical Society
PY  - 2017
SP  - 881
EP  - 904
VL  - 19
IS  - 3
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4171/jems/682/
DO  - 10.4171/jems/682
ID  - JEMS_2017_19_3_a5
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Guillaume Lecué
%A Shahar Mendelson
%T Sparse recovery under weak moment assumptions
%J Journal of the European Mathematical Society
%D 2017
%P 881-904
%V 19
%N 3
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4171/jems/682/
%R 10.4171/jems/682
%F JEMS_2017_19_3_a5
Guillaume Lecué; Shahar Mendelson. Sparse recovery under weak moment assumptions. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, Tome 19 (2017) no. 3, pp. 881-904. doi : 10.4171/jems/682. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4171/jems/682/

Cité par Sources :