On Braided and Ribbon Unitary Fusion Categories
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 57 (2014) no. 3, pp. 506-510

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

We prove that every braiding over a unitary fusion category is unitary and every unitary braided fusion category admits a unique unitary ribbon structure.
DOI : 10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5
Mots-clés : 20F36, 16W30, 18D10, fusion categories, braided categories, modular categories
Galindo, César. On Braided and Ribbon Unitary Fusion Categories. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 57 (2014) no. 3, pp. 506-510. doi: 10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5
@article{10_4153_CMB_2013_017_5,
     author = {Galindo, C\'esar},
     title = {On {Braided} and {Ribbon} {Unitary} {Fusion} {Categories}},
     journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
     pages = {506--510},
     year = {2014},
     volume = {57},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Galindo, César
TI  - On Braided and Ribbon Unitary Fusion Categories
JO  - Canadian mathematical bulletin
PY  - 2014
SP  - 506
EP  - 510
VL  - 57
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5/
DO  - 10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5
ID  - 10_4153_CMB_2013_017_5
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Galindo, César
%T On Braided and Ribbon Unitary Fusion Categories
%J Canadian mathematical bulletin
%D 2014
%P 506-510
%V 57
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5/
%R 10.4153/CMB-2013-017-5
%F 10_4153_CMB_2013_017_5

[1] [1] Baez, J. C., Higher-dimensional algebra. II. 2-Hilbert spaces. Adv. Math. 127 (1997), no. 2, 125–189. Google Scholar | DOI

[2] [2] Drinfeld, V., Gelaki, S., Nikshych, D., and Ostrik, V., On braided fusion categories. I. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 16 (2010), no. 1, 1–119. Google Scholar | DOI

[3] [3] Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., and Ostrik, V., On fusion categories. Ann. of Math. (2) 162 (2005), no. 2, 581–642. Google Scholar | DOI

[4] [4] Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., and Ostrik, V., Weakly group-theoretical and solvable fusion categories. Adv. Math. 226 (2011), no. 1, 176–205. Google Scholar | DOI

[5] [5] Etingof, P., Nikshych, D., and Ostrik, V., Fusion categories and homotopy theory. Quantum Topology 1 (2010), no. 3, 209–273. Google Scholar | DOI

[6] [6] Freedman, M. H., P/NP, and the quantum field computer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998), no. 1, 98–101. Google Scholar | DOI

[7] [7] Galindo, C., Hong, S.-M., and Rowell, E., Generalized and quasi-localizations of braid group representations. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2013, no. 3, 693–731. Google Scholar

[8] [8] Gelaki, S. and Nikshych, D., Nilpotent fusion categories. Adv. Math. 217 (2008), no. 3, 1053–1071. Google Scholar | DOI

[9] [9] Kassel, C., Quantum groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 155, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. Google Scholar

[10] [10] Kitaev, A. Yu., Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Physics 303 (2003), no. 1, 2–30. Google Scholar | DOI

[11] [11] Moore, G. and Read, N., Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall efect. Nuclear Phys. B 360 (1991), no. 2–3, 362–396. Google Scholar | DOI

[12] [12] Müeger, M., Galois theory for braided tensor categories and the modular closure. Adv. Math. 150 (2000), no. 2, 151–201. Google Scholar | DOI

[13] [13] Müeger, M., From subfactors to categories and topology II. The quantum double of tensor categories and subfactors. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 180 (2003), no. 1–2, 159–219. Google Scholar | DOI

[14] [14] Read, N. and Rezayi, E., Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level. Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999), 8084. Google Scholar

[15] [15] Rowell, E. C., On a family of non-unitarizable ribbon categories. Math. Z. 250 (2005), no. 4, 745–774. Google Scholar | DOI

[16] [16] Turaev, V. G., Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds. Second Revised Ed., de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 18, Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin, 2010. Google Scholar

[17] [17] Wang, Z., Topological quantum computation. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, 112, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010. Google Scholar

[18] [18] Wenzl, H., C*-tensor categories from quantum groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1998), no. 2, 261–282. Google Scholar | DOI

[19] [19] Witten, E., Topological quantum field theory. Comm. Math. Phys. 117 (1998), no. 3, 353–386. Google Scholar | DOI

[20] [20] Yamagami, S., Polygonal presentations of semisimple tensor categories. J. Math. Soc. Japan 54 (2002), no. 1, 61–88. Google Scholar | DOI

Cité par Sources :