Multiplicity Free Jacquet Modules

Aizenbud, Avraham ; Gourevitch, Dmitry

Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 55 (2012) no. 4, pp. 673-688

Résumé

Let $F$ be a non-Archimedean local field or a finite field. Let $n$ be a natural number and $k$ be 1 or 2. Consider $G\,:=\,\text{G}{{\text{L}}_{n+k}}\left( F \right)$ and let $M\,:=\,\text{G}{{\text{L}}_{n}}\left( F \right)\,\times \,\text{G}{{\text{L}}_{k}}\left( F \right)\,<\,G$ be a maximal Levi subgroup. Let $U\,<\,G$ be the corresponding unipotent subgroup and let $P\,=\,MU$ be the corresponding parabolic subgroup. Let $J\,:=\,J_{M}^{G}\,:\,\mathcal{M}\left( G \right)\,\to \,\mathcal{M}\left( M \right)$ be the Jacquet functor, i.e., the functor of coinvariants with respect to $U$ . In this paper we prove that $J$ is a multiplicity free functor, i.e., $\dim\,\text{Ho}{{\text{m}}_{M}}\left( J\left( \pi\right),\,\rho\right)\,\le \,1$ , for any irreducible representations $\pi $ of $G$ and $\rho $ of $M$ . We adapt the classical method of Gelfand and Kazhdan, which proves the “multiplicity free” property of certain representations to prove the “multiplicity free” property of certain functors. At the end we discuss whether other Jacquet functors are multiplicity free.

Détail

DOI : 10.4153/CMB-2011-127-8

Mots-clés : 20G05, 20C30, 20C33, 46F10, 47A67, multiplicity one, Gelfand pair, invariant distribution, finite group

Bibliographie

[1] [1] Aizenbud, A., Avni, N., and Gourevitch, D., Spherical pairs over close local fields, Comment. Math. Helv., to appear. arxiv:0910.3199[math.RT]. Google Scholar

[2] [2] Aizenbud, A. and Gourevitch, D., Generalized Harish-Chandra descent, Gelfand pairs, and an Archimedean analog of Jacquet-Rallis’ heorem. Duke Math. J. 149(2009)no. 3, 509–567. Google Scholar | DOI

[3] [3] Aizenbud, A. and Gourevitch, D., Multiplicity one theorem for (GL(ℝ), GL (ℝ)). Selecta Math. 15(2009), no. 2, 271–294. Google Scholar | DOI

[4] [4] Aizenbud, A., Gourevitch, D., Rallis, S., and Schiffmann, G., Multiplicity one theorems. Ann. of Math. 172(2010), no. 2, 1407–1434. Google Scholar

[5] [5] Bernstein, J., P-invariant distributions on GL(N) and the classification of unitary representations of GL(N) (non-archimedean case). In: Lie Group Representations, II. Lecture Notes in Math. 1041. Springer, Berlin, 1984, pp. 50–102. Google Scholar

[6] [6] Bernstein, J., Representations of p-adic groups, lecture notes written by Karl E. Rumelhart at Harvard University, Fall 1992. Available at http://www.math.tau.ac.il/_bernstei/Publication_list/publication_texts/Bernst_Lecture_p-adic_repr.pdf. Google Scholar

[7] [7] Bernstein, J. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Representations of the group GL(n, F), where F is a local non-Archimedean field. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 10(1976), no. 3, 5–70. Google Scholar

[8] [8] Deligne, P. La conjecture de Weil. II. Inst. Hautes études Sci. Publ. Math. 52(1980), 137–252. Google Scholar

[9] [9] Faddeev, D. K., Complex representations of the general linear group over a finite field. Modules and representations. Zap. Nauchn. Sere. LOMI (1974), 64–88 (1974); English transl. J. Soviet Math. 9(1978), no. 3, 64–88. Google Scholar

[10] [10] Gelfand, I. M. and Kazhdan, D., Representations of the group GL(n, K) where K is a local field. In: Lie Groups and Their Representations. Halsted, New York, 1975, pp. 95–118. Google Scholar

[11] [11] Green, J. A., The characters of the finite general linear groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 80(1955), 402–447. Google Scholar | DOI

[12] [12] Goryachko, E. E., The simplicity of the branching of representations of the groups GL(n, q) under the parabolic restrictions. Zap. Nauchn. Semin. POMI 373(2009), 124–133; English transl. to appear in J. Math. Sci. (2010) Google Scholar

[13] [13] Goryachko, E. E., An elementary proof of the simplicity of the branching of representations of the groups GL(n, q) under the parabolic restrictions. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen 44(2010), no. 2, 82–87; English transl. Funct. Anal. Appl. 44(2010), no. 2, 146–150. Google Scholar

[14] [14] Jacquet, H. and Rallis, S., Uniqueness of linear periods. Compositio Math. 102(1996), no. 1, 65–123. Google Scholar

[15] [15] Sun, B. and Zhu, C.-B., Multiplicity one theorems: the archimedean case. Ann. of Math., to appear. arxiv:0903.1413[math.RT]. Google Scholar

[16] [16] Vershik, A. M. and Kerov, S. V., On an infinite-dimensional group over a finite field. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 32(1998), no. 3, 3–10, 95; English transl. Funct. Anal. Appl. 32 (1998), no. 3, 147–152. Google Scholar

[17] [17] Vershik, A. M. and Kerov, S. V., Four drafts on the representation theory of the group of infinite matrices over a finite field, preprint availiable at http://www.pdmi.ras.ru/znsl/2007/v344.html Google Scholar

[18] [18] Zelevinsky, A. V.. Representations of Finite Classical Groups. A Hopf Algebra Approach. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 869. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981. Google Scholar