Geodesic
Weak*-Closed Derivations from C[0,1] into L ∞[0,1]
Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 39 (1996) no. 3, pp. 367-375

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press

We show that every weak*-closed derivation from C[0,1] ⊂ L ∞[0, 1] into L ∞[0, 1] is the inverse of integration against a function in L 1[0,1].
DOI : 10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8
Mots-clés : Primary: 46L57, Secondary: 46J10, 46E05 
Weaver, Nik. Weak*-Closed Derivations from C[0,1] into L ∞[0,1]. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 39 (1996) no. 3, pp. 367-375. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8
@article{10_4153_CMB_1996_044_8,
     author = {Weaver, Nik},
     title = {Weak*-Closed {Derivations} from {C[0,1]} into {L} \ensuremath{\infty}[0,1]},
     journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
     pages = {367--375},
     year = {1996},
     volume = {39},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Weaver, Nik
TI  - Weak*-Closed Derivations from C[0,1] into L ∞[0,1]
JO  - Canadian mathematical bulletin
PY  - 1996
SP  - 367
EP  - 375
VL  - 39
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8/
DO  - 10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8
ID  - 10_4153_CMB_1996_044_8
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Weaver, Nik
%T Weak*-Closed Derivations from C[0,1] into L ∞[0,1]
%J Canadian mathematical bulletin
%D 1996
%P 367-375
%V 39
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8/
%R 10.4153/CMB-1996-044-8
%F 10_4153_CMB_1996_044_8

[1] 1. K. Batty, C. J., Derivations on compact spaces, Proc. London Math. Soc. 42(1981), 299–330. Google Scholar

[2] 2. Bratteli, O., Derivations, dissipations and group actions on C*-algebras, Springer LNM 1229(1986). Google Scholar

[3] 3. Bratteli, O. and Haagerup, U., Unbounded derivations and invariant states, Commun. Math. Phys. 59( 1978), 79–95. Google Scholar

[4] 4. Bratteli, O., Herman, R. H., and Robinson, D. W., Quasianalytic vectors and derivations of operator algebras. Math. Scand. 39( 1976), 371–381. Google Scholar

[5] 5. Bratteli, O. and Robinson, D. W., Unbounded derivations of von Neumann algebras, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré25, Section A(1976), 139-164. Google Scholar

[6] 6. Bratteli, O. and Robinson, D. W., Unbounded derivations and invariant trace states, Commun. Math. Phys. 46( 1976), 31–35. Google Scholar

[7] 7. deLaubenfels, R., Well-behaved derivations on C[0, 1], Pac. J. Math. 115(1984), 73. Google Scholar

[8] 8. Goodman, F. M., Closed derivations in commutative C*-algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 39(1980), 308–346. Google Scholar

[9] 9. Kurose, H., An example of a non quasi well-behaved derivation in C(I), J. Funct. Anal. 43( 1981 ), 193—201. Google Scholar

[10] 10. Kurose, H., Closed derivations in C(l), Tohoku Math. J. 35(1983), 341–347. Google Scholar

[11] 11. Laczkovich, M., Derivations on differentiable functions, Real Analysis Exchange 7(1981—82), 239—254. Google Scholar

[12] 12. Sakai, S., Operator algebras in dynamical systems, Cambridge University Press, 1991. Google Scholar

[13] 13. Tomiyama, J., On the closed derivations on the unit interval, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 1(1986), 71—80. Google Scholar

[14] 14. Weaver, N., Order completeness in Lipschitz algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 130(1995). Google Scholar

[15] 15. Weaver, N., Nonatomic Lipschitz spaces, Studia Math. 115(1995), 277–289. Google Scholar

[16] 16. Weaver, N., Lipschitz algebras and derivations of von Neumann algebras, J. Funct. Anal., to appear. Google Scholar

Cité par Sources :