Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Cambridge University Press
Hébert, Michel. Characterizations of Axiomatic Categories of Models Canonically Isomorphic to (Quasi-)Varieties. Canadian mathematical bulletin, Tome 31 (1988) no. 3, pp. 287-300. doi: 10.4153/CMB-1988-042-x
@article{10_4153_CMB_1988_042_x,
author = {H\'ebert, Michel},
title = {Characterizations of {Axiomatic} {Categories} of {Models} {Canonically} {Isomorphic} to {(Quasi-)Varieties}},
journal = {Canadian mathematical bulletin},
pages = {287--300},
year = {1988},
volume = {31},
number = {3},
doi = {10.4153/CMB-1988-042-x},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1988-042-x/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Hébert, Michel TI - Characterizations of Axiomatic Categories of Models Canonically Isomorphic to (Quasi-)Varieties JO - Canadian mathematical bulletin PY - 1988 SP - 287 EP - 300 VL - 31 IS - 3 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1988-042-x/ DO - 10.4153/CMB-1988-042-x ID - 10_4153_CMB_1988_042_x ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Hébert, Michel %T Characterizations of Axiomatic Categories of Models Canonically Isomorphic to (Quasi-)Varieties %J Canadian mathematical bulletin %D 1988 %P 287-300 %V 31 %N 3 %U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4153/CMB-1988-042-x/ %R 10.4153/CMB-1988-042-x %F 10_4153_CMB_1988_042_x
[1] 1. Burris, S., Remarks on reducts of varieties, in Universal Algebra, Coll. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai (Esztergom 1977), pp. 161–168. Google Scholar
[2] 2. Chang, C. C., Keisler, H. J., Model Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977). Google Scholar
[3] 3. Eklof, P. C., Ultraproducts for algebraists, in Handbook of Mathematical Logic (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977). Google Scholar
[4] 4. Gratzer, G., Universal Algebra (Springer-Verlag, New-York 1979). Google Scholar
[5] 5. Hatcher, W. S., Whitney, S., Characterizing categories of algebras, Algebra Universalis, 19 (1984), pp. 231–242. Google Scholar
[6] 6. Hébert, M., Sur le rang et la définissabilité des opérations implicites dans les classes d'algèbres, manuscript. Google Scholar
[7] 7. Herrera, J., Les théories convexes de Horn, C.R. Acad. Se. Paris Série A, 287 (1978), pp. 593–594. Google Scholar
[8] 8. Hodges, W., Functorial uniform reducibility, Fund. Math. 108 (1980), pp. 77–81. Google Scholar
[9] 9. Isbell, J. R., Subobjects, adequacy, completeness and categories of algebras, Rozprawy Mat. 36 (1964), pp. 3–33. Google Scholar
[10] 10. Lawvere, F. W., Functorial semantics of algebraic theories, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 50 (1963), pp. 864–872. Google Scholar
[11] 11. Linton, F. E. J., Some aspects of equational categories, in Proceedings of the Conference of Categorical Algebra (La Jolla 1965) (Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1966). Google Scholar
[12] 12. MacLane, S., Categories for the Working Mathematician (Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1971). Google Scholar
[13] 13. Rabin, M. O., Classes of models and sets of sentences with the intersection property, Ann. Sci. Univ. Clermont 7 (1962), pp. 39–53. Google Scholar
[14] 14. Richter, M., Limites in Kategorien von Relationalsystemen, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. 17(1971), pp. 75–90. Google Scholar
[15] 15. Volger, H., Preservation theorems for limits of structures and global sections of sheaves of structures, Math. Z. 166 (1979), pp. 27–53. Google Scholar
Cité par Sources :